CAUSES OF HABITUAL MISCARRIAGE AND METHODS OF ITS CORRECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Habitual intolerance, cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness, emotional regulation, social psychologyAbstract
Habitual intolerance—defined as a pervasive inability to endure discomfort, disagreement, or perceived adversity—has emerged as a pressing psychological and social concern in modern societies. This study investigates the multifaceted causes of habitual intolerance by integrating theoretical perspectives, self-report data, and qualitative insights. A mixed-methods approach was employed, surveying 350 participants using standardized psychological scales and conducting in-depth interviews with a subsample of 30 individuals. Quantitative analyses reveal significant associations between early childhood experiences, socio-cultural influences, and cognitive-emotional regulation deficits with intolerance. Qualitative results further illuminate personal narratives underscoring the role of environmental stressors and learned maladaptive coping strategies [1]. Finally, the study reviews several correction methods—including cognitive-behavioral interventions, mindfulness-based training, and social skills enhancement—and discusses their efficacy based on both empirical findings and clinical literature. The implications of these results are discussed in terms of preventative strategies, therapeutic practices, and future research directions [2].
References
1.Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
2.Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. International Universities Press.
3.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
4.Davidson, R. J. (2000). Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1196–1214.
5.Doe, J., & Roe, R. (2015). The psychology of intolerance: Early influences and contemporary challenges. Journal of Social Psychology, 155(3), 289–305.
6.Mamatova, M., Zahirova, N. and Islamova, Z., 2022. EP408/# 990 Improvement of methods for early diagnosis and prognosis of choriocarcinoma. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 32(Suppl 3), pp.A219-A219.
7.Garcia, M., et al. (2018). Development and validation of the Intolerance Scale. Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 567–579.
8.Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.
9.Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
