FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC OUTCOMES OF ORBITAL FLOOR RECONSTRUCTION IN ZYGOMATIC-ORBITAL COMPLEX TRAUMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Comprehensive reconstruction of orbital floor defects in zygomatic-orbital complex trauma allows reliable restoration of orbital anatomy, ocular function, and facial aesthetics. Individualized surgical planning combined with objective anthropometric and radiological assessment improves postoperative outcomes and patient rehabilitation.Abstract
Background:
Orbital floor fractures associated with zygomatic-orbital complex trauma represent a significant challenge in craniofacial surgery due to the risk of functional and aesthetic complications, including diplopia, enophthalmos, orbital asymmetry, and impaired ocular motility. Modern reconstructive approaches emphasize restoration of orbital anatomy and facial symmetry through individualized surgical planning and stable fixation techniques.
Objective:
To evaluate the functional and aesthetic outcomes of orbital floor reconstruction in patients with zygomatic-orbital complex trauma using clinical, radiological, and anthropometric assessment methods.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective clinical study included patients with zygomatic-orbital complex fractures involving the orbital floor. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included computed tomography (CT), ophthalmologic examination, anthropometric facial analysis, and assessment of ocular motility. Surgical treatment consisted of open reduction and internal fixation combined with orbital floor reconstruction using titanium mesh and individualized reconstructive techniques.
Results:
Postoperative evaluation demonstrated restoration of orbital anatomy and significant improvement in facial symmetry. Reduction of enophthalmos, normalization of orbital volume, improvement of ocular motility, and resolution of diplopia were achieved in the majority of patients. Anthropometric analysis demonstrated restoration of midfacial projection and orbital symmetry. Stable functional and aesthetic outcomes were observed without severe postoperative complications.
Downloads
References
1. Ellis E, Perez D. An algorithm for the treatment of isolated zygomatico-orbital fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(10):1975–1983.
2. Hammer B. Orbital Fractures: Diagnosis, Operative Treatment, Secondary Corrections. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber; 1995.
3. AO Foundation CMF Principles in Orbital Reconstruction. AO CMF Trauma Guidelines.
4. Dubois L, Steenen SA, Gooris PJ, Mourits MP, Becking AG. Controversies in orbital reconstruction—II. Timing of post-traumatic orbital reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(4):433–440.
5. Kontio R. Treatment of orbital fractures: the case for reconstruction with bioresorbable materials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(7):863–868.
6. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. Raven Press; 1994.
7. Boyette JR, Pemberton JD, Bonilla-Velez J. Management of orbital fractures: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:2127–2137.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India