FORENSIC EVALUATION OF INJURY MECHANISMS BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BODILY TRAUMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Forensic medicine, bodily injuries, morphological characteristics, injury mechanism, trauma assessment, medico-legal expertiseAbstract
Accurate determination of injury mechanisms is a fundamental task in forensic medical practice, as it directly influences medico-legal conclusions and judicial decision-making. Morphological characteristics of bodily injuries provide objective and reliable evidence for reconstructing the mechanism of trauma. This article analyzes the forensic significance of morphological features of bodily injuries in determining trauma mechanisms. The study emphasizes the role of external and internal morphological indicators in differentiating between various types of mechanical trauma, including blunt force, sharp force, and combined injuries. The findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive morphological approach to ensure accuracy and objectivity in forensic assessments.
Downloads
References
1.Knight, B., & Saukko, P. (2016). Knight’s Forensic Pathology. CRC Press.
2.DiMaio, V. J. M., & DiMaio, D. (2001). Forensic Pathology. CRC Press.
3.Dolinak, D., Matshes, E., & Lew, E. (2005). Forensic Pathology: Principles and Practice. Elsevier.
4.Spitz, W. U., & Fisher, R. S. (2006). Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death. Charles C. Thomas.
5.Payne-James, J., Byard, R. W., Corey, T. S., & Henderson, C. (2017). Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine. Elsevier.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India