YURIST FAOLIYATIDA TASHABBUSKORLIK, KREATIVLIK VA MASALAGA IJODIY YONDASHUVNING NAZARIY VA AMALIY ASOSLARI

Authors

  • Namozova Parvina Buxoro Davlat Univeriteti, tarix va yuridik fakulteti 5-4-25yurs guruh talabasi,
  • Aminov Daler Alisher-o‘g‘li Buxoro Davlat Univeriteti o‘qituvchisi, Buxoro, O‘zbekiston2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

Yurist, tashabbuskorlik, kreativlik, ijodiy yondashuv, huquqiy tafakkur, innovatsiya, muammo yechimi.

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada yurist faoliyatida tashabbuskorlik, kreativlik va turli masalalarga ijodiy yondashuvning nazariy asoslari hamda amaliy ahamiyati chuqur tahlil qilinadi. Zamonaviy huquq tizimi murakkab va tez o‘zgaruvchan ijtimoiy munosabatlar bilan bog‘liq bo‘lib, bu yuristlardan nafaqat an’anaviy bilim va malakalarni, balki innovatsion fikrlash, yangi yondashuvlarni ishlab chiqish va muammolarni noodatiy hal etish qobiliyatini talab etadi. Tashabbuskorlik yuristning faol pozitsiyasini belgilab, huquqiy muammolarni oldindan ko‘ra bilish va samarali strategiyalar ishlab chiqishga xizmat qiladi. Kreativlik esa mavjud qonunchilik normalarini yangi sharoitlarga moslashtirish va murakkab vaziyatlarda optimal yechim topish imkonini beradi. Maqolada yuristning professional kompetensiyalari tarkibida kreativ tafakkur, analitik yondashuv va strategik qaror qabul qilish muhim komponentlar sifatida ko‘rib chiqiladi. Shuningdek, ijodiy yondashuvning huquqiy amaliyotdagi o‘rni, xususan, sud jarayonlari, muzokaralar olib borish, huquqiy hujjatlar tayyorlash va nizolarni muqobil hal etishdagi ahamiyati ochib beriladi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Alexy, R. (2002). On the structure of legal principles. Ratio Juris, 13(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00173

2.Dworkin, R. (1983). Law as interpretation. Critical Inquiry, 9(1), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1086/448146

3.Posner, R. A. (1993). What do judges maximize? (The same thing everybody else does). Supreme Court Economic Review, 3, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.3.11471662

4.Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as fairness. The Philosophical Review, 67(2), 164–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182612

5.Kelsen, H. (1957). What is justice? California Law Review, 45(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/3478020

6.Luhmann, N. (1988). The unity of the legal system. Law & Society Review, 22(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053626

7.Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1–2), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1

8.Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x

9.Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419309534467

10.Florida, R. (2002). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00314

11.Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Resource review: Creativity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(4), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.39.4.55-60

12.Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

13.Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502

14.Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press (adapted research). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1950-2

15.Susskind, R. (2010). The future of law. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 17(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2010.486844

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

How to Cite

YURIST FAOLIYATIDA TASHABBUSKORLIK, KREATIVLIK VA MASALAGA IJODIY YONDASHUVNING NAZARIY VA AMALIY ASOSLARI. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(5), 295-299. https://doi.org/10.55640/