THEORETICAL VIEWS OF EASTERN LINGUISTS ABOUT ALLOMORPHS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the development and study of the concept of allomorph in Eastern linguistics. It analyzes how Eastern linguists have defined, classified, and interpreted allomorphs, focusing on phonetic, morphological, and semantic factors influencing their appearance in Arabic, Persian, Turkic, and other Eastern languages. The research also compares the Eastern perspectives on allomorphy with those of Western linguistics, identifying both commonalities and differences. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of morphological structures in Eastern languages and clarifies the theoretical foundations of allomorphy from a diachronic and typological viewpoint.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.1.Abduzuhur Abduazizov. Uzbek language phonology and morphophonology. “University” T. 2010. B-122.
2.2.Dr. Iran Kalbasi. (1992) Derivative construction of the word. Sāxt-e ešteγāγi-ye vāže. (Tehran)
3.3.Hojiyev A. Tilshunoslik terminlaring izhohli lu‘ati. T.: 2002. – B. 21.
4.4.Iriskulov M. (2009) Introduction to Linguistics. Tilshunoslikka khirish. (Tashkent)
5.5.Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. Japanese Morphophonemics: Markedness and Word Structure. MIT Press. 2004.
6.6.Nurmonov A. and b. Uzbek language semantic syntax. T.Fan,1992
7.7.Paroma Sanyal, Vyom Sharma, Ankita Prasad. Hindi root allomorphy: Insights from phonological and morphosyntactic theory. De Gruyter Mouton, 2021
8.8. Peysikov L.S. (1973) Essays on word formation of the Persian language. Ocherki po slovobrazvaniyu persidskogo yazika. (Moscow)
9.9. Rasulov R. (2010) General Linguistics. General linguistics. (Tashkent)
10.10. Kim O., Lvova I. i Elkin D. Innovatsionnye priemy, ispolzuemye na seminarskikh zanyatiyax po discipline "theoreticheskaya morphology i syntaxis koreyskogo zyzyka". "Foreign languages in Uzbekistan" scientific-methodical electronic journal. No. 2 (10) / 2016.