CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FUNCTIONAL IMPRESSIONS USING CUSTOM TRAYS IN THE FABRICATION OF COMPLETE REMOVABLE DENTURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Complete removable dentures, custom impression tray, functional impression, border molding, denture retention, prosthodontics, edentulism.Abstract
The rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients remains a profound challenge in contemporary prosthodontics, primarily due to the complex biomechanical requirements of retention, stability, and support. This study investigates the clinical significance and efficacy of taking functional impressions using custom trays compared to standard anatomical impressions in the fabrication of complete removable dentures. A comprehensive clinical trial was conducted at the clinical base of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry and Orthodontics at Andijan State Medical Institute, involving sixty-three completely edentulous patients. The participants were divided into a main group, which received dentures fabricated via functional impressions with custom trays, and a control group, which received dentures fabricated using standard trays. Clinical outcomes were meticulously evaluated based on denture retention, stability, mucosal health, masticatory efficiency, and overall patient satisfaction. The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the main group across all evaluated parameters. Patients in the functional impression group exhibited superior denture retention and required significantly fewer post-insertion adjustments due to mucosal ulcerations. Furthermore, their self-reported satisfaction and masticatory performance were markedly higher. The findings robustly conclude that the utilization of custom trays for functional border molding and secondary impressions is an indispensable clinical procedure that substantially enhances the functional and anatomical integration of complete dentures, thereby significantly improving the quality of life for edentulous individuals.
Downloads
References
1.Basker, R. M., Davenport, J. C., & Thomason, J. M. (2011). Prosthetic treatment of the edentulous patient (5th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
2.Carlsson, G. E., & Omar, R. (2010). The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 37(2), 143-156.
3.Zarb, G. A., Hobkirk, J. A., Eckert, S. E., & Jacob, R. F. (2013). Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: Complete dentures and implant-supported prostheses (13th ed.). Elsevier Mosby.
4.Kapur, K. K. (1967). A clinical evaluation of denture adhesives. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 18(6), 550-558.
5.Leles, C. R., Ferreira, N. P., Vieira, A. H., & Martins, R. R. (2009). Patient satisfaction with complete dentures: A randomized clinical trial comparing standard and simplified methods. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 22(5), 455-460.
6.Rahn, A. O., Ivanhoe, J. R., & Plummer, K. D. (2009). Textbook of complete dentures (6th ed.). People's Medical Publishing House.
7.Slade, G. D., & Spencer, A. J. (1994). Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dental Health, 11(1), 3-11.
8.Winkler, S. (2009). Essentials of complete denture prosthodontics (2nd ed.). AITBS Publishers.
9.Xie, Q., Ding, T., & Lin, G. (2017). A clinical evaluation of complete dentures fabricated with a conventional method versus a simplified method. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 117(2), 250-254.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India