THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIDACTIC THOUGHT IN THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OF UZBEKISTAN IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH – FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY

Authors

  • Rashidov Abduaziz Abduvali ugli Doctoral Candidate (PhD), Department of Pedagogy, Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

didactic thought, history of education in Uzbekistan, usuli-qadim, usuli-savtiya, usuli-jadid, Jadidism, maktab-madrasa schools, teaching methods, literature review.

Abstract

This article presents a systematic literature review of scholarly investigations into the development of didactic thought within the educational system of Uzbekistan during the second half of the 19th century and the first quarter of the 20th century. Works by domestic and international researchers, doctoral dissertations, monographs, and academic articles were examined through a structured analytical framework. The review reveals that, while a considerable body of scholarship addresses various dimensions of the subject, the theoretical and methodological foundations of didactic systems, the dynamics of their mutual influence, and the mechanisms of transformation from traditional to modernised educational paradigms remain insufficiently explored.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Sukhareva O.A. Bukhara in the 19th – Early 20th Century. Moscow: Nauka, 1966. 326 p.

2. Nalivkin V.P. Indigenous Schools in the Turkestan Region. Tashkent, 1913. 248 p.

3. Hafizova M. From the History of Uzbek Folk Pedagogy. Tashkent: Fan, 2000. 216 p.

4. Sharipov R. Madrasas of Central Asia. Samarkand, 2005. 248 p.

5. Karayev T.K. The Philosophy of Islamic Education. Tashkent, 2001. 256 p.

6. Abdullayev A. The Muslim System of Education. Tashkent: Fan, 2007. 168 p.

7. Khalid A. The Jadids and the Jadid Movement. Tashkent, 1990. 96 p.

8. Kasimov B. Jadid Intellectuals and Educational Reform. Tashkent: Fan, 1998. 208 p.

9. Kholmurodov M. The Methodology of Usuli-Jadid Schools. Tashkent, 1995. 152 p.

10. Hasanov Q. The Didactic Principles of New-Method Schools. Tashkent, 2003. 148 p.

11. Hasanov H. The Pedagogical Activity of Abdulla Avloniy. Tashkent, 1992. 112 p.

12. Sharipov Sh. Abdulla Avloniy: Educator and Enlightener. Tashkent, 1998. 144 p.

13. Mavlonova R. The Pedagogical Legacy of Abdulla Avloniy. Tashkent: Fan, 2005. 198 p.

14. Mirziyoyev S. The Pedagogical Views of Mahmudkhoja Behbudiy. Tashkent, 2001. 132 p.

15. Egamnazarov N. The Pedagogical Views of Mahmudkhoja Behbudiy: Doctoral Dissertation. Tashkent, 2003.

16. Mavlonova R. A Didactic Analysis of Jadid Textbooks. Tashkent, 2003. 144 p.

17. Hasanov H. Hoji Mu'in and Other Jadid Textbooks. Tashkent, 2000. 128 p.

18. Nishonova B. Teaching Methods in the Late 19th – Early 20th Century: Doctoral Dissertation. Tashkent, 2004.

19. Ismoilov I. Oral, Written and Practical Methods of Instruction in Traditional Schools. Tashkent, 2002. 136 p.

20. Mukhammadiyev M.M. The Introduction of Usuli-Savtiya into Uzbekistan. Tashkent, 1999. 120 p.

21. Sodiqova R. A Comparative Analysis of Usuli-Qadim and Usuli-Savtiya. Tashkent, 2006. 144 p.

22. Aminov Z. Teacher Training in the Jadid Period. Tashkent, 2001. 128 p.

23. Samadov A. The Didactic Competence of the Jadid Teacher. Tashkent, 2004. 116 p.

24. Nishonova S. The Pedagogical Skills of Traditional School Teachers. Tashkent, 2000. 104 p.

25. Muslimov N. The Professional Development of the Teacher: Historical and Contemporary Dimensions. Tashkent: Fan, 2007. 192 p

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

How to Cite

THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIDACTIC THOUGHT IN THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OF UZBEKISTAN IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH – FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(02), 2595-2603. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 3349

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.