Ecopoetics of Uzbek Prose in the Independence Period

Authors

  • Namazova Manzura Urakovna PhD, Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

ecopoetics, Uzbek prose, material agency, ecocide, ecocriticism, post-independence literature

Abstract

This article explores the ecopoetic dimensions of Uzbek prose produced during the period of independence, with particular attention to the concepts of material agency and ecocide. Drawing on contemporary ecocritical theory, the study examines how natural elements—land, water, flora, fauna, and climate—function not merely as background settings but as active agents shaping narrative meaning and ethical discourse. The phenomenon of ecocide, understood as large-scale environmental destruction resulting from human activity, is analyzed as a central thematic and ideological concern in post-independence Uzbek prose. The article argues that Uzbek writers reinterpret nature as a moral and cultural subject, reflecting national memory, post-Soviet trauma, and ecological responsibility. Through ecopoetic analysis, the study demonstrates how literature becomes a space for environmental consciousness and resistance against anthropocentric paradigms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Adamson J, Evans M, Stein R, editors. The environmental justice reader: Politics, poetics, and pedagogy. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press; 2002. 424 p.

2.Bekmirzaev S. Postkolonial tafakkur va zamonaviy o‘zbek nasri. Toshkent: Mumtoz so‘z; 2019. 176 p.

3.Bennett J. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham (NC): Duke University Press; 2010. 200 p.

4.Berry W. The unsettling of America: Culture and agriculture. San Francisco (CA): Sierra Club Books; 1977. 234 p.

5.Buell L. The environmental imagination: Thoreau, nature writing, and the formation of American culture. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1995. 560 p.

6.Buell L. The future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing; 2005. 224 p.

7.Clark T. Ecocriticism on the edge: The anthropocene as a threshold concept. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2015. 208 p.

8.Garrard G. Ecocriticism. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2012. 232 p.

9.Glotfelty C, Fromm H, editors. The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. Athens (GA): University of Georgia Press; 1996. 418 p.

10.Heise UK. Sense of place and sense of planet: The environmental imagination of the global. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. 288 p.

11.Huggan G, Tiffin H. Postcolonial ecocriticism: Literature, animals, environment. London: Routledge; 2010. 272 p.

12.Iovino S, Oppermann S. Material ecocriticism. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press; 2014. 256 p.

13.Karimov N. O‘zbek adabiyotida mustaqillik davri nasri muammolari. Toshkent: Fan; 2012. 240 p.

14.Moore JW. Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. London: Verso; 2015. 336 p.

15.Nixon R. Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2011. 464 p.

16.Oppermann S. From material to posthuman ecocriticism // Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment. 2013;20(1):69–93.

17.Qodirov A. Adabiyot va zamon: Mustaqillik davri badiiy tafakkuri. Toshkent: Akademnashr; 2016. 198 p.

18.Rasulov R. Ekologik muammolar va badiiy tafakkur // O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti. 2018;(4):45–52.

19.Slovic S. Going away to think: Engagement, retreat, and ecocritical responsibility. Reno (NV): University of Nevada Press; 2008. 288 p.

20.Yuldasheva D. Tabiat obrazi va milliy xotira masalasi // Filologiya masalalari. 2020;(2):67–74.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

How to Cite

Ecopoetics of Uzbek Prose in the Independence Period. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(01), 1443-1448. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1792

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.