MODAL AND SUBJUNCTIVE CONSTRUCTIONS AS MARKERS OF IRREALIS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK FAIRY TALES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
irrealis, modality, subjunctive mood, Uzbek linguistics, English linguistics, fairy tales, comparative analysisAbstract
This study investigates how modal and subjunctive constructions serve as linguistic markers of irrealis in English and Uzbek fairy tales. Irrealis, a grammatical and semantic category expressing unrealized, hypothetical, or imaginary states, reveals how languages encode human perception of possibility and unreality. The research employs a semantic-pragmatic and typological framework, analyzing a corpus of canonical English (Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty) and Uzbek (Zumrad va Qimmat, Boy va kambag‘al) fairy tales. English texts express irrealis primarily through modal verbs (would, could, might) and subjunctive structures (if I were, so be it), while Uzbek relies on conditional suffixes (-sa), auxiliaries (edi), and particles (go‘yo, xuddi). The findings show that while both languages use grammatical mood to construct hypothetical worlds and moral imagination, English foregrounds individual volition and uncertainty, whereas Uzbek emphasizes collective destiny and divine causality. This comparative insight contributes to contrastive linguistics, translation studies, and the semantics of folklore discourse, illuminating the deep link between language structure and cultural worldview.
Downloads
References
1.Abdivalievna, K. O. (2019). Comparative analyses of Uzbek and English cumulative fairy tales. International Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Studies.
2.Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
3.Bashir, E. (2025). A Grammar of Khowar: Descriptive and Comparative Analysis. Routledge.
4.Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.
5.Emadi, N. (2013). Tense and Mood in Persian and English: A Contrastive and Error Analysis. University of Malaya.
6.Kenjabayev, J. A., & Nazarova, J. B. (2025). Short Stories and Their Grammatical Aspects in English and Uzbek Languages. Ekonomika i Sotsium.
7.Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
8.Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
9.Rasulova, M. I., & Shukurova, Z. I. (2017). Comparative Typology of English, Uzbek and Russian Languages. Gulistan State University.
10.Satvoldievna, U. D., & Qizi, A. M. N. (2020). Comparative Typological Analysis of Semantic-Structural Features of Conditional Inclination in Different Systematic Languages. Problems of Modern Science and Education.
11.Üzüm, M. (2023). The Development and Functions of the Inferential Marker chog‘i in Uzbek. Acta Linguistica Academica, 70(1), 109–128.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India