MODAL AND SUBJUNCTIVE CONSTRUCTIONS AS MARKERS OF IRREALIS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK FAIRY TALES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Tursunova Sarvinoz master student of SamSIFL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

irrealis, modality, subjunctive mood, Uzbek linguistics, English linguistics, fairy tales, comparative analysis

Abstract

This study investigates how modal and subjunctive constructions serve as linguistic markers of irrealis in English and Uzbek fairy tales. Irrealis, a grammatical and semantic category expressing unrealized, hypothetical, or imaginary states, reveals how languages encode human perception of possibility and unreality. The research employs a semantic-pragmatic and typological framework, analyzing a corpus of canonical English (Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty) and Uzbek (Zumrad va Qimmat, Boy va kambag‘al) fairy tales. English texts express irrealis primarily through modal verbs (would, could, might) and subjunctive structures (if I were, so be it), while Uzbek relies on conditional suffixes (-sa), auxiliaries (edi), and particles (go‘yo, xuddi). The findings show that while both languages use grammatical mood to construct hypothetical worlds and moral imagination, English foregrounds individual volition and uncertainty, whereas Uzbek emphasizes collective destiny and divine causality. This comparative insight contributes to contrastive linguistics, translation studies, and the semantics of folklore discourse, illuminating the deep link between language structure and cultural worldview.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Abdivalievna, K. O. (2019). Comparative analyses of Uzbek and English cumulative fairy tales. International Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Studies.

2.Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.

3.Bashir, E. (2025). A Grammar of Khowar: Descriptive and Comparative Analysis. Routledge.

4.Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.

5.Emadi, N. (2013). Tense and Mood in Persian and English: A Contrastive and Error Analysis. University of Malaya.

6.Kenjabayev, J. A., & Nazarova, J. B. (2025). Short Stories and Their Grammatical Aspects in English and Uzbek Languages. Ekonomika i Sotsium.

7.Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

8.Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

9.Rasulova, M. I., & Shukurova, Z. I. (2017). Comparative Typology of English, Uzbek and Russian Languages. Gulistan State University.

10.Satvoldievna, U. D., & Qizi, A. M. N. (2020). Comparative Typological Analysis of Semantic-Structural Features of Conditional Inclination in Different Systematic Languages. Problems of Modern Science and Education.

11.Üzüm, M. (2023). The Development and Functions of the Inferential Marker chog‘i in Uzbek. Acta Linguistica Academica, 70(1), 109–128.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-10

How to Cite

MODAL AND SUBJUNCTIVE CONSTRUCTIONS AS MARKERS OF IRREALIS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK FAIRY TALES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(01), 421-424. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2065

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.