THE CONCEPT OF “CHILD” IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES: LINGUOCOGNITIVE AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
child, concept, linguocognitive analysis, cultural semantics, comparative linguistics, Uzbek, English.Abstract
The concept of child is a fundamental linguistic and cultural category reflecting not only the biological stage of human life but also deep moral, emotional, and cultural values. This paper explores how the concept of child is represented and verbalized in English and Uzbek languages from a linguocognitive and comparative perspective. It examines the cultural and cognitive associations attached to the word child in both linguistic systems, showing how each language encodes the notion of innocence, growth, and dependence through distinct lexical and phraseological means. The analysis is based on examples from modern English and Uzbek literary and cultural contexts.
Downloads
References
1.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
2.Oxford English Dictionary. (2023). Definition of “Child”. Oxford University Press.
3.Rahmatullayev, Sh. (2008). O‘zbek tilining izohli lug‘ati. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi.
4.Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. Oxford University Press.
5.Norman, A. (2019). Cultural Semantics of Childhood in English Literature. Language and Culture Studies Journal, 14(2), 55–67.
6. Tadjibaeva, G. (2019). Til va madaniyat: lingvomadaniyatshunoslik asoslari. Toshkent: Fan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India