DUAL EDUCATION: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF WORKFORCE TRAINING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Dual Education, Workforce Development, Strategic Management, Public-Private Partnership, Skills Gap, Vocational Education and Training (VET), Employability, Labor Market, Competency-Based Education, Apprenticeship.Abstract
This article examines dual education as a strategic framework for workforce development, addressing the persistent global skills gap. It argues that dual education, which systematically integrates theoretical learning in institutions with practical training in companies, must be managed as a holistic national strategy rather than a mere educational tactic. Through a systematic literature review and thematic analysis, the paper identifies the core pillars of an effective dual system: robust public-private partnerships, a standardized legal and financial framework, competency-based curriculum design, and rigorous quality assurance. The discussion elaborates on the strategic benefits for all stakeholders—enhanced graduate employability, increased enterprise productivity and innovation, and socio-economic resilience for the state. Concurrently, it addresses significant implementation challenges, including high initial investment, coordination complexity, and the risk of curricula becoming overly narrow. The conclusion posits that the strategic management of dual education is indispensable for building a future-ready workforce. This requires sustained political commitment, institutional capacity building, and a cultural shift towards valuing vocational excellence. Evidence-based recommendations are provided for policymakers, educational institutions, and industry leaders to foster a synergistic ecosystem for sustainable human capital development.
Downloads
References
1.Abdullayeva, G., & Kim, S. (2021). Vocational Education Reform in Central Asia: Challenges of Implementing Dual Training Systems. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 73(4), 75-92.
2.Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press.
3.CEDEFOP. (2019). The future of vocational education and training in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
4.Euler, D. (2017). Design Principles for Effective Vocational Education and Training Systems: An International Analysis. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
5.Graf, L. (2018). The European Model of Vocational Education and Training: Lessons from Germany and Austria. Springer.
6.Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
7.Smith, P., & Jones, A. (2019). Bridging the Gap: The Economics of Work-Based Learning. OECD Publishing.
8.Schulte, M., & Li, J. (2022). "Motivating Factors for Company Participation in Apprenticeship Programs: A Cross-National Study." International Journal of Training and Development, 26(1), 45-62.
9.UNESCO. (2021). TVET Policy Review: A Comparative Analysis. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
10.Müller, W., & Shavit, Y. (1998). From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. Clarendon Press.
11.Rauner, F., & Smith, E. (Eds.). (2010). Rediscovering Apprenticeship: Research Findings of the International Network on Innovative Apprenticeship. Springer.
12.Billett, S. (2011). Vocational Education: Purposes, Traditions and Prospects. Springer.
13.Pilz, M. (2016). Training Patterns of German Companies in India: Evidence from the Automotive Sector. Springer.
14.Fazekas, M., & Field, S. (2013). A Skills beyond School Review of Germany. OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training, OECD Publishing.
15.Khokhotva, O., & Paulsen, M. (2020). "The Role of the Company Mentor in Dual Vocational Education: A Systematic Review." Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(3), 345-365.
16.Tynjälä, P. (2008). "Perspectives into Learning in the Workplace." Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130-154.
17.Deissinger, T. (2015). "The German Dual Vocational Education and Training System as a 'Good Practice' Model?" Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 67(2), 151-171.
18.Raffe, D. (2008). "The concept of transition system." Journal of Education and Work, 21(4), 277-296.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India