SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND AGE-RELATED CHANGES IN THE SHAPE OF THE EXTERNAL HUMAN NOSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
nose morphology; sexual dimorphism; aging; anthropometry; nasal anthropometry; nasolabial angle, external nose, nasal dimensions, forensic anthropology.Abstract
The external nose is a central facial structure influencing respiration, olfaction, and aesthetics. Sexual dimorphism and age-related changes in nasal morphology are well-documented across populations, with implications for clinical practice (otolaryngology, plastic surgery), forensic anthropology, and anthropometric research. Emphasis is placed on external nasal dimensions (length, height, width, nasolabial angle, nasal projection), patterns of sexual dimorphism, and trajectories of nasal growth and involution from infancy through late adulthood. Males generally present larger absolute nasal dimensions (length, breadth, projection) while females often show relatively narrower nasal bases and more acute nasolabial angles. Sexual differences emerge during puberty and are maintained into adulthood. Aging leads to common morphological trends: increased nasal length and projection due to soft tissue sagging and continued growth of cartilaginous and bony structures, widening of nasal base and alar flaring, and changes in nasal tip rotation (tending toward ptosis). Ethnic and population variation modifies the magnitude and pattern of these changes. Nasal morphology reflects both genetic and environmental influences and undergoes predictable sex- and age-related transformations. Clinicians should consider these dynamics during reconstructive and aesthetic procedures; forensic and anthropological fields should integrate age- and sex-specific models for improved accuracy.
Downloads
References
1.Farkas, L. G. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. (1981/1994). A foundational text describing craniofacial measurements and norms.
2.Kolar, J. C., & Salter, E. (1997). Clinical craniofacial anthropometry: An introduction. A practical guide for craniofacial measurement techniques.
3.Kahn, D. M., & Shaw, D. (2005). Nasal aging and rejuvenation: Effects on external nasal anatomy. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America.
4.Rohrich, R. J., & Ahmad, J. (2010). The aging nose: Structural changes and implications for rhinoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
5.Singh, S., & Sharma, R. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in nasal anthropometry among adult Indians: clinical and forensic perspectives. International Journal of Morphology.
6.Prendergast, P. J., & Thomason, P. (2011). Age-related changes in cartilage: implications for nasal structure. Journal of Anatomy.
7.Aldridge, K., Boyadjiev, S. A., Capone, G. T., DeLeon, V. B., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (2005). Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures: implications for craniofacial research. American Journal of Human Biology.
8.Farkas, L. G., Forrest, C. R., & Phillips, J. H. (1996). Nasal anthropometry in adult populations: norms and variability. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
9.Kwon, S., Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2014). 3D nasal morphometric comparison of multiple ethnic groups. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
10.Wilkinson, C. L., & Timms, D. (2001). Age and sex effects on nasal morphology: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Legal Medicine.
11.Mowlavi, A., et al. (2013). Effects of aging on nasal tip support and rotation. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery.
12.Oladipo, G., & Ojo, J. (2008). Nasal anthropometry in forensic sex estimation: a review. Journal of Forensic Sciences.
13.Saban, Y., & Rohrich, R. J. (2016). Principles of tip support in rhinoplasty with aging considerations. Clinics in Plastic Surgery.
14.Farkas, L.G., Munro, I.R. (1987). Anthropometric facial records and standards.
15.Day, R. M., et al. (2010). Photogrammetric vs. direct anthropometry in nasal measurements. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India