Operation Iraqi Freedom: A Case Study in the Unilateral Enforcement of UN Security Council Resolutions

Main Article Content

Philip Owusu

Abstract

This study examines the unilateral enforcement of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions through the lens of Operation Iraqi Freedom, focusing on the complexities and implications of this approach. Operation Iraqi Freedom, launched in 2003, was a significant military intervention led by the United States and its coalition partners, ostensibly to enforce UNSC resolutions related to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs and its compliance with international mandates. This study delves into the legal and political justifications presented for the operation, analyzing how the intervention was framed as a necessary action to uphold UNSC authority. The research investigates the extent to which the operation adhered to or deviated from international law, particularly in the context of UNSC resolutions and the principles of state sovereignty and collective security. By reviewing the resolutions passed by the UNSC, the legal arguments made by the coalition forces, and the responses from the international community, this study highlights the tensions between unilateral actions and multilateralism in international relations.


The findings reveal that while the operation was justified by its proponents as a means of enforcing UNSC mandates, it faced significant criticism for bypassing formal UNSC authorization and undermining the principles of international consensus and legitimacy. The study further explores the broader implications of unilateral enforcement on the authority of the UNSC, the credibility of international law, and the dynamics of global governance. Ultimately, this case study provides insights into the challenges of balancing national interests with international obligations and the impact of unilateral actions on global order. The research offers recommendations for future policy and diplomatic strategies to ensure that the enforcement of UNSC resolutions remains consistent with international legal norms and principles of collective security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Operation Iraqi Freedom: A Case Study in the Unilateral Enforcement of UN Security Council Resolutions. (2024). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 3(04), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.55640/jmsi-03-04-01

References

Cassese, A., (2001), International Law Oxford: Oxford University Press

Detter, I., (2000), The Law of War, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition

Gray, C., (2002), ―From Unity to Polarization: International Law and the Use of Force in Iraq‖ European Journal of International Law, Vol.13, No.1, 1-19

Higgins, R., (1994), Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It Oxford: Oxford University Press

Higgins, R., (1995), ―Peace and Security Achievements and Failures‖, European Journal of International Law, Vol.6, pp.1-46

Hongsheng, S., (2006), ―The Evolution of Law and War‖, Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 1, 267-301

Jennings, R. QC and Watts, A. QC (eds), (1991), Oppenheim’s International Law: Ninth Edition London: Longman, 41-42

Kress, C., (2004), ―The Iraqi Special Tribunal and the Crime of Aggression‖, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2, 374-352

Mullerson, R., and Scheffer, D. J., (1995), ―Legal Regulation of the Use of Force‖ in Damrosch, L. R., Danilenko, G. M., and Mullerson, R., Beyond Confrontation, Colorado:Westview Press

Ochoa-Ruiz, N. and Salamanca-Aguado, E., (2005), ―Exploring the Limits of International Law relating to the Use of Force in Self-defence‖, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp.499–524

Pellet, A., (2000), ―Brief Remarks on the Unilateral Use of Force‖, European Journal of International Law, Vol.11 No.2, pp.385-392

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.