Operation Iraqi Freedom: A Case Study in the Unilateral Enforcement of UN Security Council Resolutions
Abstract
This study examines the unilateral enforcement of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions through the lens of Operation Iraqi Freedom, focusing on the complexities and implications of this approach. Operation Iraqi Freedom, launched in 2003, was a significant military intervention led by the United States and its coalition partners, ostensibly to enforce UNSC resolutions related to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs and its compliance with international mandates. This study delves into the legal and political justifications presented for the operation, analyzing how the intervention was framed as a necessary action to uphold UNSC authority. The research investigates the extent to which the operation adhered to or deviated from international law, particularly in the context of UNSC resolutions and the principles of state sovereignty and collective security. By reviewing the resolutions passed by the UNSC, the legal arguments made by the coalition forces, and the responses from the international community, this study highlights the tensions between unilateral actions and multilateralism in international relations.
The findings reveal that while the operation was justified by its proponents as a means of enforcing UNSC mandates, it faced significant criticism for bypassing formal UNSC authorization and undermining the principles of international consensus and legitimacy. The study further explores the broader implications of unilateral enforcement on the authority of the UNSC, the credibility of international law, and the dynamics of global governance. Ultimately, this case study provides insights into the challenges of balancing national interests with international obligations and the impact of unilateral actions on global order. The research offers recommendations for future policy and diplomatic strategies to ensure that the enforcement of UNSC resolutions remains consistent with international legal norms and principles of collective security.
Keywords
Unilateral Enforcement, UN Security Council Resolutions, Operation Iraqi FreedomHow to Cite
References
Cassese, A., (2001), International Law Oxford: Oxford University Press
Detter, I., (2000), The Law of War, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition
Gray, C., (2002), ―From Unity to Polarization: International Law and the Use of Force in Iraq‖ European Journal of International Law, Vol.13, No.1, 1-19
Higgins, R., (1994), Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It Oxford: Oxford University Press
Higgins, R., (1995), ―Peace and Security Achievements and Failures‖, European Journal of International Law, Vol.6, pp.1-46
Hongsheng, S., (2006), ―The Evolution of Law and War‖, Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 1, 267-301
Jennings, R. QC and Watts, A. QC (eds), (1991), Oppenheim’s International Law: Ninth Edition London: Longman, 41-42
Kress, C., (2004), ―The Iraqi Special Tribunal and the Crime of Aggression‖, Journal of International Criminal Justice 2, 374-352
Mullerson, R., and Scheffer, D. J., (1995), ―Legal Regulation of the Use of Force‖ in Damrosch, L. R., Danilenko, G. M., and Mullerson, R., Beyond Confrontation, Colorado:Westview Press
Ochoa-Ruiz, N. and Salamanca-Aguado, E., (2005), ―Exploring the Limits of International Law relating to the Use of Force in Self-defence‖, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp.499–524
Pellet, A., (2000), ―Brief Remarks on the Unilateral Use of Force‖, European Journal of International Law, Vol.11 No.2, pp.385-392
Copyright (c) 2024 Philip Owusu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
