COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT PROSTHODONTIC METHODS (EARLY LOADING IMPLANTATION AND TRADITIONAL BRIDGEWORK) ON PATIENTS' QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE RESTORATION OF DENTAL ARCH DEFECTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The restoration of dental arch defects is a cornerstone of modern dentistry, directly impacting patients' functional, aesthetic, and psychological well-being. While traditional fixed partial dentures (bridges) have been a reliable solution, dental implants offer a conservative and biomechanically sound alternative. Within implantology, early functional loading protocols have gained prominence, aiming to shorten treatment times and improve patient satisfaction. However, a comprehensive comparative analysis of early loading implant protocols versus traditional bridgework, particularly concerning their long-term effects on bone physiology, microcirculation, and patient-reported quality of life, remains a critical area of investigation. This study aims to provide a comparative evaluation of these treatment modalities to establish evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Al-Sabbagh, M., & Tarawneh, S. (2020). Dental Implants: A Comprehensive Guide to Success. Springer.
2.Annibali, S., Cristalli, M. P., Dell'Aquila, D., Bignozzi, I., La Monaca, G., & Pilloni, A. (2009). Short dental implants: a systematic review. Journal of Dental Research, 88(9), 801–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509343468
3.Buser, D., Sennerby, L., & De Bruyn, H. (2017). Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12185
4.Chen, J., & Cai, M. (2020). The efficacy of immediate, early, and conventional loading of dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 35(1), e1-e23. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7628
5.Esposito, M., Grusovin, M. G., Maghaireh, H., & Worthington, H. V. (2013). Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub4
6.Gallucci, G. O., Hamilton, A., Zhou, W., Buser, D., & Chen, S. (2018). Implant placement and loading protocols: a systematic review. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 33. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2018.10.suppl.g1.1
7.Jacobs, R., Salmon, B., Codari, M., Hassan, B., & Bornstein, M. M. (2018). Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health, 18(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5
8.Papaspyridakos, P., Chen, C. J., Chochlidakis, K. M., & Weber, H. P. (2014). A systematic review of biologic complications with fixed implant-supported reconstructions: Abutment and framework fracture. The International journal of prosthodontics, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4011
9.Pjetursson, B. E., Thoma, D., Jung, R., Zwahlen, M., & Zembic, A. (2012). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical oral implants research, 23, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x
10.Slade, G. D. (1997). Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 25(4), 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
11.Srinivasan, M., Meyer, S., Mombelli, A., & Müller, F. (2017). Dental implants in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral implants research, 28, 920-930. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13000
12.Sugiura, T., Horiuchi, M., & Nogami, S. (2015). The use of laser Doppler flowmetry in oral surgery: a review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 44(2), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.007
13.Torroella-Saura, G., Salgado-Peralvo, A. O., et al. (2021). Oral health-related quality of life of patients with implant-supported fixed prostheses, tooth-supported fixed prostheses and removable partial dentures. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 13(9), e913. https://dx.doi.org/10.4317%2Fjced.58611
14.Van de Velde, T., Glor, F., & De Bruyn, H. (2010). A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different level of experience in implant surgery. Clinical oral implants research, 21(4), 380-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01856.x
15.Zembic, A., & Wismeijer, D. (2014). Patient-reported outcomes of maxillary implant-supported restorations. The International journal of prosthodontics, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3685