THE STUDY OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN LINGUISTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
phraseology, comparative linguistics, semantics, Uzbek, Japanese.Abstract
This study examines the lexical-semantic features of phraseological units in Uzbek and Japanese through a comparative approach. Phraseological expressions are analyzed as culturally marked elements that reflect national worldview and traditions. The research is based on corpus data and phraseological dictionaries, with theoretical foundations drawn from both classical and modern works in phraseology. The analysis identifies semantic fields, mechanisms of meaning transfer, and issues of equivalence in translation. The findings contribute to comparative linguistics and provide practical insights for translation and intercultural communication.
Downloads
References
1. Polivanov, E.D. Articles on General Linguistics. Moscow: Nauka, 1968.
2. Shakhmatov, A.A. Syntax of the Russian Language. 4th ed. Moscow: LKI, 2007.
3. Vinogradov, V.V. On the Basic Types of Phraseological Units (1947). In: Selected Works: Lexicology and Lexicography. Moscow, 1977.
4. Rakhmatullayev, Sh. Modern Literary Uzbek Language (Textbook). Tashkent, 2006.
5. Turopova, N. “A Comparative Study of Japanese and Uzbek Phraseological Units.” OTA, no. 3, 2010.
6. Kilichev, E. Modern Uzbek Literary Language. Tashkent, 1999.
7. Uluqov, N. Theory of Linguistics: A Textbook. Tashkent, 2016.
8. Abduazizov, A. Introduction to the Theory of Linguistics. Tashkent: Sharq, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India