PSYCHOLOGICAL STRATEGIES FOR COPING WITH STRESS: A PATHWAY TO MENTAL WELL-BEING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Stress management, psychological approaches, cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness, resilience, coping strategies, positive psychology, mental health, emotional regulation, well-beingAbstract
Stress has become a defining feature of modern life, affecting individuals across diverse cultural, occupational, and social settings. It is widely recognized as a psychological and physiological response to external or internal pressures that challenge an individual’s perceived capacity to cope. Persistent stress is linked to anxiety, depression, burnout, cardiovascular problems, and impaired immune functioning, making its effective management a critical concern for health and psychology. This article explores psychological approaches to stress management, emphasizing cognitive-behavioral techniques, mindfulness-based practices, positive psychology interventions, and social support systems. These methods are grounded in empirical research and are designed to enhance resilience, promote adaptive coping, and foster mental well-being. The review synthesizes current literature to provide an integrated framework of stress reduction strategies, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations. Furthermore, the article presents a conceptual methodology for analyzing stress interventions, focusing on individual differences, contextual factors, and long-term sustainability of outcomes. By examining both theoretical and applied perspectives, this study underscores the importance of developing tailored psychological strategies that empower individuals to navigate stress more effectively. Ultimately, the findings stress the necessity of proactive psychological management to reduce the negative consequences of stress and to cultivate resilience in an increasingly demanding world.
Downloads
References
1.Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
2.Selye, H. (1976). The stress of life. McGraw-Hill.
3.Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. Guilford Press.
4.Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Bantam.
5.Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386.
6.Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35–43.
7.Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 57–62.
8.Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
9.Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.
10.Richardson, K. M., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008). Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 69–93.
11.Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management: A meta-analysis. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 593–600.
12.Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India