APHORISMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK: A COMPARATIVE REFLECTION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes the linguocultural features of aphorisms. Aphorisms are considered as an important reflection of national mentality, values, and culture, with their semantic, conceptual, and cultural messages identified. A comparative analysis of English and Uzbek sports aphorisms highlights both commonalities and national specificities.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Geary, J. (2007). Geary’s Guide to the World’s Great Aphorists. New York: Bloomsbury. — A comprehensive curated anthology with brief source notes—useful for sampling aphorism genres and voices.
2.Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A Handbook. Westport, CT: Greenwood. — Paremiology classic—methods, functions, typology; helpful for distinguishing proverbs vs. aphorisms and shared features.
3.Honeck, R. P. (1997). A Proverb in Mind: The Cognitive Science of Proverbial Wit and Wisdom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. — Cognitive-linguistic approaches to brevity, figurativity, and processing—transferable to aphorisms.
4.Norrick, N. R. (1985). How Proverbs Mean: Semantic Studies in English Proverbs. Berlin: Mouton. — Semantic and pragmatic frames; sharp for meaning, illocution, and cultural scripts.
5.Kuiper, K. (2015). Proverbs: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. — Concise orientation to proverbial/aphoristic discourse, functions, and history.
6.Arora, S. (1994). The Perception of Proverbiality. Proverbium 11, 1–38. — Criteria by which communities recognize an utterance as a proverb/aphorism—useful for boundary-setting.
7.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. — Foundational for metaphor; supports analysis of figurative schemas in aphorisms.