A SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF ARROGANCE ON THE MORAL AND SPIRITUAL WELL-BEING OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN THE ERA OF GLOBALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
arrogance, youth, globalization, morality, spirituality, socio-philosophical analysisAbstract
The era of globalization has created new opportunities for communication, education, and personal growth, yet it has also introduced moral and spiritual challenges for the younger generation. Among these challenges, arrogance has emerged as a significant social and psychological issue. This article explores the phenomenon of arrogance in the context of youth, analyzing its philosophical underpinnings, social causes, and destructive effects on moral and spiritual well-being. The study argues that globalization, while promoting individual freedom and access to knowledge, has also intensified materialism and self-centeredness, contributing to the rise of arrogance among young people. The research suggests that moral education, cultural values, and spiritual development are critical in mitigating these effects and ensuring the holistic growth of youth.Downloads
References
1.Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
2.Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3.Fromm, E. (1976). To Have or To Be? New York: Harper & Row.
4.Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.
5.Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India