NATIONAL IDENTITY OF METONYMY IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Metonymy, national identity, Uzbek language, English language, cognitive linguistics, cultural linguisticsAbstract
This paper explores the role of metonymy in expressing national identity within Uzbek and English languages. Metonymy, a fundamental cognitive and linguistic mechanism, is not only a stylistic device but also a reflection of a society's cultural values and worldview. By comparing the national-specific metonymic structures in both languages, this article reveals how language encodes cultural perspectives, social institutions, and identity markers. The paper further highlights key differences and similarities, supported by linguistic examples from various domains such as politics, geography, cuisine, and traditional expressions.Downloads
References
1.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
2.Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.
3.Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge University Press.
4.Sharifov, A. (2019). O‘zbek tilida metafora va metonimiya turlari. Toshkent: Fan nashriyoti.
5.Taylor, J.R. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India