FACTORS SHAPING THE PRAGMATIC MEANING OF INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In linguistics, there are numerous theoretical perspectives aimed at determining the nature of the sentence phenomenon and its status within language and speech systems. Moreover, the definitions given to the concept of "sentence" are innumerable. This is because each linguist sets a specific task when selecting a sentence as an object of research or referring to this concept in the analysis of other linguistic units. This, in turn, further attests to the fact that a sentence is a multi-layered, multifaceted, and extremely complex linguistic object. Consequently, from the multitude of existing definitions and descriptions, it becomes evident that a sentence, as a linguistic unit, has a certain structure related to each of its individual characteristics. A sentence, as an element of speech, possesses two high-level categories of abstraction: intention (speech purpose) and predicativity.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.1. Pishchalnikova V.A. Theory of psycholinguistics. - M.: FGBOU VO. MGLU, 2017. - 161 p.
2. Humboldt V. Von. Selected works on linguistics. - M.: Progress, 1984. - 397 p.
3. Saifullaeva R.R., Mengliev B.R., Bokieva G.Kh., Kurbonova M.M., Yunusova Z.Kh., Abuzalov M.Kh. Theory of linguistics. - T.: Fun and technology, 2010. - 404 p.
4. Yusupov O.K. The universal language of English. – T.: Akademnashr, 2011. – 376 p.
5.Fillmore Ch.J. Verbs of judging: An exercise in semantic description//Studies in linguistic semantics. New York, 1987.
6.Allort N. Key terms in pragmatics. –N.Y.: Bloombery publishing, 2010.– 289 p.
7.Crystal D. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. – L.: Blackwell publishing, 2008. – 529 p.
8.Safarov Sh. Tilshunoslik termlari lugati. – Tashkent:, 2013.
9.Moskal'skaya O.I. Problems of systemic description of syntax. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1975. – 156 p.
10. Leech G. Towards a Semantic Description of English. –London: Longman, 1991. –277 p.