DEVELOPING A STRUCTURED DUE DILIGENCE METHODOLOGY FOR AUDIT FIRMS: A RISK-BASED PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Dilmurod Sidikov Assistant Teacher, Accounting and Auditing Department, Faculty of Economics, TIIAME National Research University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20068836

Keywords:

due diligence; audit firms; risk-based methodology; ISRS 4400; ISQM 1; risk scoring; audit-related services; quality management

Abstract

The expansion of audit-related services has increased the need for audit firms to provide due diligence engagements that are systematic, risk-sensitive, well documented and compatible with professional quality management requirements. In practice, due diligence is often performed through fragmented checklists or expert judgment, which may create inconsistency in risk identification, evidence collection, reporting and engagement quality. This article develops a structured due diligence methodology for audit firms from a risk-based perspective. The study applies qualitative document analysis, comparative standard mapping and design-science logic to synthesize requirements and principles from ISRS 4400 (Revised), ISAE 3000 (Revised), ISQM 1, OECD risk-based due diligence guidance, ISO 31000 risk-management logic and contemporary sustainability due diligence developments. The proposed methodology consists of seven interconnected stages: engagement acceptance, scope and criteria definition, risk-universe construction, targeted evidence planning, analytical testing, risk scoring and decision-oriented reporting. The results present a practical framework, risk matrix, quality gates, working paper structure and reporting architecture that audit firms can adapt for financial, tax, legal, operational, governance and ESG due diligence. The article argues that due diligence should not be treated merely as a transaction checklist but as a disciplined professional service governed by risk assessment, ethical safeguards, documentation standards and firm-level quality management. The proposed model strengthens comparability, transparency and usefulness of due diligence reports for investors, owners, lenders and other decision-makers.

References

1.Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2017). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. COSO. https://www.coso.org/guidance-erm

2.European Commission. (2024). Corporate sustainability due diligence. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/business-and-industry/doing-business-eu/sustainability-due-diligence-responsible-business/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en

3.International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2013). International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised), Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information. IAASB. https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-assurance-engagements-isae-3000-revised-assurance-engagements-other-audits-or

4.International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2020a). International Standard on Related Services 4400 (Revised), Agreed-upon procedures engagements. IAASB. https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-related-services-isrs-4400-revised

5.International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2020b). International Standard on Quality Management 1, Quality management for firms that perform audits or reviews of financial statements, or other assurance or related services engagements. IAASB. https://www.iaasb.org/publications/international-standard-quality-management-isqm-1-quality-management-firms-perform-audits-or-reviews

6.International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants. (2024). International code of ethics for professional accountants (including International Independence Standards). IESBA. https://www.ethicsboard.org/iesba-code

7.International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management - Guidelines. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html

8.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). OECD due diligence guidance for responsible business conduct. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-due-diligence-guidance-for-responsible-business-conduct_15f5f4b3-en.html

9.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises on responsible business conduct. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises-on-responsible-business-conduct_81f92357-en.html

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

DEVELOPING A STRUCTURED DUE DILIGENCE METHODOLOGY FOR AUDIT FIRMS: A RISK-BASED PERSPECTIVE. (2026). International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics, 5(5), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20068836

Similar Articles

31-40 of 667

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.