THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “SOFT POWER” IN THE SOUTH KOREA’S FOREIGN POLICY IN CENTRAL ASIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
South Korea, soft power, foreign policy, Central Asia, cultural diplomacy, education, technology partnerships, development assistance, bilateral relations, Nye, diplomatic influence.Abstract
This section analyzes the effectiveness of South Korea’s soft power as a strategic tool in Central Asia, examining how cultural, educational, technological, and development initiatives influence bilateral and regional relations. Drawing on Joseph Nye’s theoretical framework, it evaluates instruments such as K-pop, Korean cinema, scholarships, technological partnerships, and aid programs. The analysis includes case studies and measurable outcomes, assessing impacts on public perception, diplomatic influence, trade, and policy alignment. Comparative insights highlight the advantages of soft power over traditional hard power approaches, demonstrating its role in achieving sustainable foreign policy objectives in a region influenced by competing global actors.
References
1.Polese, A., Ambrosio, T., & Kerikmäe, T. (2020). Estonian Identity Construction Between Nation Branding and Building. Mezinárodní Vztahy, 55(2), 22–46.
2.Belmonte, L. A. Selling the american way: U.S. propaganda and the cold war. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2008.
3.Chung, H. S. "Hating the Korean wave in Japan: the exclusivist inclusion of Zainichi Koreans in Nerima Daikon Brothers." In Hallyu 2.0: the Korean wave in the age of social media, edited by S. Lee, A. M. Nornes, N. Kwak, and Y. Ryu, 195-211. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2015.
4.Nye Jr., J. S. Soft power and great-power competition. shifting sands in the balance of power between the United States and China. Cambridge: Springer, 2023.
5. Zamorano, M. M. "Reframing cultural diplomacy: the instrumentalization of culture under the soft power theory." Culture Unbound 8, no. 2 (2016): 166-186.
6. Chang, Y. (2017). South Korea’s soft power in cultural diplomacy. International Relations Review, 12(3), 49-65.
7.Chung, Y. (2015). South Korea’s role in regional security organizations: ASEAN Regional Forum and the East Asia Summit. East Asia Security Journal, 11(2), 85-100.
8. Choi, S. (2018). The Korean Wave and South Korea’s regional diplomacy. Journal of Asian Politics, 20(1), 99-115.
9. Kim, C. (2014). The Korean Wave and soft power in South Korea's foreign policy. Journal of Asian Studies, 27(4), 123-141.
10.Moon, B. (2020). North Korea’s nuclear threat and its implications on South Korean soft power. Pacific Review, 32(2), 56-73.
11. Kim, J. (2016). Trust politic: South Korea’s regional security approach. Asian Security Review, 10(3), 73-90.
12.Lee, K., & Kim, H. (2012). South Korea’s soft power: A new form of diplomacy. International Affairs, 88(6), 1023-1035.
13. Nye, J. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
14. I. Wilson, Ends changed, means retained: scholarship programs, political influence, and drifting goals, Br. J. Polit. Int. Relat. 17 (1) (2015) 130–151.
15. Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). The Return of the Single-Country Study. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 187–203.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
