The Secrets to Effective Performance Measurement: Identifying Key Success Factors
Keywords:
Performance Measurement, Success Factors, Organizational StrategyAbstract
This study, The Secrets to Effective Performance Measurement: Identifying Key Success Factors, delves into the essential elements that contribute to the effectiveness of performance measurement systems within organizations. As businesses strive to align their strategies with operational outcomes, performance measurement becomes a critical tool for decision-making, resource allocation, and continuous improvement. However, the effectiveness of these measurement systems often depends on a variety of factors, including leadership, data accuracy, employee engagement, and alignment with organizational goals. This research investigates these key success factors through a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys of management professionals with qualitative case studies from organizations across various sectors. The findings reveal that a clear link between performance metrics and organizational strategy, coupled with transparent communication and employee involvement in the measurement process, significantly enhances the success of performance measurement systems. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of adapting measurement tools to the dynamic business environment and fostering a culture of accountability. By identifying these key factors, the research offers actionable insights for organizations seeking to optimize their performance measurement processes and drive greater operational efficiency.
References
Akbar, R., 2011. Performance Measurement and Accountability in Indonesian Local Government. Curtin University.
Akbar, R., R, Pilcher., and B, Perrin., 2012. “Performance Measurement in Indonesia: The Case of Local Government”. Pacific Accounting Review, pp 262-291.
Artley, Will., 2001. The Per f or mance Management Handbook Volume 3: Establishing Accountability f or Performance. USA: Performance- Based Management Special Interest Group (PB MSIG).
Astuti, R. T., and Adiwibowo, A. S., 2011. Persepsi terhadap Pengembangan SistemPengukuran, Akuntabilitas, dan Penggunaan Informasi Kinerja di Instansi Pemerintah. http://www.eprint.undip.ac.id.
Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re- search in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN 1478-0887.
Cavalluzzo, K. S., and Ittner, Christopher. D., 2003. “Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government”. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29.
Creswell, John. W., 2010. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixededisi ketiga. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Creswell, John. W., and Plano, Clark. Vicki. L., 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage.
DiMaggio, Paul. J., and Walter, W. Powell., 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-60.
Effendi, Taufiq., 2006. Modul Indikator Kinerja.Kementerian Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara.
Fachruzzaman and Norman., 2010. “Implementasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) di Kota Bengkulu”. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII.
Gudono., 2012. Teori Organisasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Galang Sinaga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
