Entrepreneurial Orientation and Success: A Study of Small Enterprises in Kendari City
Abstract
This study, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Success: A Study of Small Enterprises in Kendari City, examines the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and the success of small enterprises in Kendari, Indonesia. EO, which encompasses innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness, is often viewed as a key determinant of business growth and sustainability. Through a combination of surveys, interviews, and case studies, the research explores how small business owners in Kendari adopt entrepreneurial orientations and how these orientations impact their operational success. The findings suggest that businesses with a strong entrepreneurial orientation are more likely to report higher levels of growth, adaptability, and profitability. The study highlights specific EO dimensions, such as innovation and risk-taking, as critical drivers of success, particularly in the context of local market dynamics and challenges. Additionally, the research identifies factors that can either enhance or hinder the effectiveness of EO, including access to resources, market competition, and managerial capabilities. Based on these insights, the study provides recommendations for small enterprises in Kendari to strengthen their entrepreneurial orientation in order to foster long-term success and competitiveness in a rapidly changing business environment.
Keywords
Entrepreneurial Orientation, Small Enterprises, Business SuccessHow to Cite
References
Acquaah, M. (2007). Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy. Strategic management journal, 28, 1235-1255.
Alchian, A. A., dan Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American economic review, 777-795.
Ali Hasan. (2008). Marketing. Yogyakarta: Media Utama.
Amin. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Kewirausahaan. Jakarta: Harvarindo.
Arikunto. (2001). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Penedekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Baird, IS dan Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking.Academy of Management Review 10: 230-243.
Bantel, K. A., dan Jackson, S. E. (1980). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of top team make a difference?.Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
Barney, J. B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitif anvantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-121.
Beald, Reginald M. (2000). Compecting Effectively: Environmental scanning, organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, january pp. 27-45.
Bhargava, M., Dubelaar. C., & S.Ramaswari. (1994). Reconciling Diverse Measures of performance: A Conseptual Framework Test of Methodology. Journal of Business Research. 31, 235-246.
Copyright (c) 2023 Dumadi Nasution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
