THE DIALECTIC OF TRADITION AND MODERNITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INITIATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Youth initiatives, Tradition, Modernity, Dialectics, Cultural values, Innovation, Education, Social developmentAbstract
This article explores the dialectical relationship between tradition and modernity in the development of youth initiatives. It argues that youth innovation cannot be fully understood without recognizing the interplay between inherited cultural-historical values and the demands of contemporary social and technological change. Tradition provides identity, stability, and continuity, while modernity introduces novelty, adaptability, and global perspectives. The paper analyzes how young people negotiate this tension in their educational, cultural, and civic practices, demonstrating that sustainable development of youth initiatives requires a synthesis of traditional resources and modern strategies. The research draws on philosophical, sociological, and pedagogical perspectives to show how this dialectic shapes both the worldview of youth and their capacity for innovative action.
References
1.Abdurahmonov H. I. PHILOSOPHICAL AND CATEGORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF YOUTH OUTLOOK AND INNOVATIVE THINKING //Мировая наука. – 2020. – №. 8 (41). – С. 3-6.
2.Ibroximovich A. K. Innovative thinking and its forms and types of manifestations //European Scholar Journal. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 5. – С. 38-41.
3.Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
6.Blank, S. (2013). The four steps to the epiphany. Pescadero, CA: K&S Ranch.
7.Bornstein, D. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
11.Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
12.Dilthey, W. (1911). Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Leipzig: Teubner.
13.Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
14.Fisher, D. R. (2016). American resistance to ecological modernization: Environmentalism and the politics of change. New York: Routledge.
15.Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
16.Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
17.Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
18.Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.Hippel, E. von. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.Ibrohimovich A. H. Modern Factors for Raising Student-youth Innovative Thinking in the Higher Education //American Journal of Pedagogical and Educational Research. – 2023. – Т. 15. – С. 202-206.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
