Intelligent Prognostic Models for Electrical Infrastructure Reliability Assessment
Keywords:
Intelligent Prognostics, Electrical Infrastructure, Reliability Assessment, Predictive MaintenanceAbstract
The reliability of electrical infrastructure has become a critical research and operational concern due to increasing system complexity, aging assets, growing energy demands, and the integration of intelligent monitoring technologies. Traditional reliability assessment methods primarily depend on periodic inspection, statistical failure analysis, and predefined maintenance schedules. Although these approaches have contributed significantly to infrastructure management, they often lack the capability to identify gradual degradation processes and predict future failure conditions. Intelligent prognostic models provide an advanced alternative by combining data-driven analytics, machine learning techniques, degradation modeling, and remaining useful life estimation to enhance reliability assessment and maintenance decision-making.
This research examines the development and application of intelligent prognostic models for electrical infrastructure reliability assessment through a comprehensive analytical framework based on predictive modeling principles. The study synthesizes concepts from reliability engineering, machine learning-based prognostics, degradation pattern analysis, and predictive maintenance methodologies. Existing research on data-driven prognostic approaches for aircraft systems, batteries, and electrical power systems is analyzed to establish theoretical foundations for applying intelligent models to electrical infrastructure.
The proposed framework integrates condition monitoring data acquisition, degradation feature extraction, prognostic model development, reliability prediction, and maintenance optimization. The research evaluates how advanced models can transform conventional maintenance practices by enabling early identification of abnormal conditions and estimation of asset remaining useful life. Machine learning-based predictive maintenance approaches demonstrate significant potential for improving electric power system reliability through continuous analysis of operational parameters and failure indicators (Philip, 2025).
Downloads
References
1. Baptista, M., I. de Medeiros, J. Malereb, C. Nascimento Jr., H. Prendinger, and E. Henriques. “Comparative case study of life usage and data-driven prognostics techniques using aircraft fault messages,” Computers in Industry, vol. 86, pp. 1–14, 2017.
2. Liu, J., and E. Zio. “System dynami. c reliability assessment and failure prognostics,” Reliability Engineering System Safety, vol. 160, pp. 21–36, 2017.
3. Philip, P. G. (2025). Predictive Maintenance Approach for Electric Power Systems Using Machine Learning. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 7(09), 145–160. Retrieved from https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir/article/view/ml-predictive-maintenance-power-systems
4. Wang, D., Y. Zhao, F. Yang, and K-L Tsui. “Nonlinear-drifted Brownian motion with multiple hidden states for remaining useful life prediction of rechargeable batteries,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 93, pp. 531–544, 2017.
5. Zhao, Z., B. Liang, and X. Wang. “Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine based on degradation pattern learning,” Reliability Engineering System Safety, vol. 164, pp. 74–83, 2017.
6. Zhou, L., S. Pan, and J. Wang. “Machine learning on big data: Opportunities and challenges,” Neurocomputing, vol. 237, pp. 350–361, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Md. Arif Hossain

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India