CATEGORIAL ANALYSIS OF SYNTAX
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
sentence nucleus, verb centric syntactic relation, syntactic chain, valency, functional complement, non-functional complement, word extender, sentence extender, valency potential.Abstract
This article focuses on issues related to the study of sentence parts in world and Uzbek linguistics and summarizes opinions aimed at solving certain problems in the analysis of sentence constituents. It also pays attention to the interpretation of syntax as a category and to approaches based on valency theory as possible solutions to the existing problems.
Downloads
References
1.Akramov, Sh. T. (1997). To‘ldiruvchi va holning o‘zbek tili gap qurilishidagi [WPm] valentlik aspekti [The Object and Adverbial Modifier in Uzbek Sentence Structure from the Perspective of Valency]. Candidate of Sciences Dissertation. Tashkent.
2.Borovkov, A. K., Ma'rufov, Z., et al. (1952). O‘zbek tili grammatikasi. II qism: Sintaksis [Uzbek Grammar. Part II: Syntax]. Tashkent: O‘zpeddavnashr.
3.Komilova, Kh. (1949). “O‘zbek tilidagi to‘ldiruvchilar haqida” [On Objects in the Uzbek Language]. Proceedings of the Institute of Language and Literature of the Academy of Sciences of the Uzbek SSR, 153–155.
4.Omonturdiev, J. (1989). Gap bo‘laklari tipologiyasi [Typology of Sentence Constituents]. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi.
5.Fitrat. (1930). O‘zbek tili qoidalari to‘g‘risida bir tajriba. Nahv [An Experiment on the Rules of the Uzbek Language. Syntax]. Book 2, 4th edition. Samarkand–Tashkent: O‘zdavnashr.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India