CLIL AS AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH IN MODERN LANGUAGE TEACHING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20589681Keywords:
Content, language integrated learning, modern language teaching, cognitive development, educational innovation, communicative competence.Abstract
This article discusses insights and perspectives on content and language integrated learning as an innovative approach in modern language teaching. In the era of globalization, the demand for proficient multilingual individuals has prompted educational institutions to shift from traditional, grammar-heavy language instruction toward more integrated, functional methodologies. Content and language integrated learning has emerged as a groundbreaking educational paradigm that addresses this need by dual-focusing on both subject matter and a foreign language.
Downloads
References
1.Coyle, D., Hood, P., Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. 65.
2.Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content and Language Integrated Learning: From practice to principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 204.
3.Lasagabaster, D., Doiz, A. (2016). CLIL teachers’ perceptions of their language virtues and shortcomings. System, 22-32.
4.Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL EMILE - The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. European Commission. 11-28.
5.Meyer, O. (2010). Introducing the CLIL-Pyramid: Key principles and strategies for quality CLIL planning and teaching. International CLIL Research Journal, 11-29.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India