SPEECH ACTS AND INTERTEXTUAL STRATEGIES IN LITERARY COMMUNICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
The theory of speech acts, initially developed by J. L. Austin and later expanded by John Searle, emphasizes the performative and functional nature of language in communication.Abstract
Literary communication represents a multidimensional interaction between language, culture, ideology, and interpretation. Within contemporary linguistics and literary studies, increasing scholarly attention has been devoted to the relationship between speech acts and intertextuality as fundamental mechanisms of meaning construction and discourse organization. Speech acts function not merely as linguistic structures conveying propositional content but also as pragmatic actions through which authors communicate intentions, emotions, evaluations, and ideological perspectives. Simultaneously, intertextual strategies enable literary texts to establish connections with other texts, historical narratives, cultural traditions, and symbolic systems, thereby enriching semantic depth and interpretative complexity.
Downloads
References
1.Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
2.Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. University of Texas Press.
3.Eliot, T. S. (1922). The Waste Land. Boni & Liveright.
4.Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Columbia University Press.
5.Milton, J. (1667). Paradise Lost. Samuel Simmons.
6.Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
7.Shakespeare, W. (1603). Hamlet. Nicholas Ling and John Trundell.
8.Joyce, J. (1922). Ulysses. Shakespeare and Company.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India
