THE STRATEGIC ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY UNDER GLOBAL ECOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
environmental policy, environmental governance, sustainable development, public governance, ecological transformation, climate governance, institutional resilience, Central Asia.Abstract
This article examines the strategic role of environmental policy under conditions of accelerating global ecological transformation and analyzes its growing significance within contemporary systems of public governance. The study explores the institutional, political, and governance dimensions of environmental policy in the context of climate change, resource scarcity, and ecological risks. Particular attention is devoted to environmental governance, institutional coordination, sustainable development, and the integration of ecological priorities into long-term state strategy. The article further analyzes the geopolitical and institutional dimensions of environmental governance in Central Asia and Uzbekistan. It is argued that environmental policy is increasingly evolving into a strategic mechanism for ensuring institutional resilience, sustainable development, and effective governance under conditions of global environmental change.
Downloads
References
1.Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. - London: Sage Publications, 1992. - 260 p.
2.Giddens A. The Politics of Climate Change. - Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011. - 264 p.
3.Rosenau J.N. Governance in a New Global Order // Global Governance. - 1995. - Vol. 1. - No. 1. - P. 13-43.
4.Crutzen P.J. Geology of Mankind // Nature. - 2002. - Vol. 415. - No. 6867. - P. 23-24.
5.World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. - 400 p.
6.Micklin P. The Aral Sea Disaster // Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. - 2007. - Vol. 35. - P. 47-72.
7.Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On the Strategy for Transition to a Green Economy.” - Tashkent, 2019.
8.Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J. The Limits to Growth. - New York: Universe Books, 1972. - 205 p.
9.United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Stockholm Declaration. - New York: United Nations, 1972.
10.Jordan A., Lenschow A. Environmental Policy Integration: A State-of-the-Art Review // Environmental Policy and Governance. - 2010. - Vol. 20. - No. 3. - P. 147-158.
11.Ostrom E. Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change // Global Environmental Change. - 2010. - Vol. 20. - No. 4. - P. 550–557.
12.Moiseev N.N. The Fate of Civilization. The Path of Reason. - Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture, 2000. - 224 p.
13.Shadimetov U. Environmental Problems of Central Asia and Issues of Sustainable Development. - Tashkent: Fan, 2015. - 286 p.
14.March J.G., Olsen J.P. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life // American Political Science Review. - 1984. - Vol. 78. - No. 3. - P. 734-749.
15.Falkner R. The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics // International Affairs. - 2016. - Vol. 92. - No. 5. - P. 1107-1125.
16.Pattberg P. Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered. - Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012. - 312 p.
17.Nigmatov A.N. Environmental Policy of Uzbekistan under Conditions of Climate Change // Ecological Bulletin of Uzbekistan. - 2021. - No. 3. - P. 18-27.
18.Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “Uzbekistan - 2030 Strategy.” - Tashkent, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India