MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF KNOWLEDGE ACCUMULATION IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING DURING STANDARDIZED TEST PREPARATION

Authors

  • Fozil U. Sulaymonov,Dushabayeva Diana Baxtiyorovna PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor Affiliation: Head of the Department of Mathematics, Jizzakh State Pedagogical University, Jizzakh, Uzbekistan,Affiliation: Jizzakh State Pedagogical University named after Abdulla Qadiri, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

mathematics education; mathematical modeling; knowledge acquisition; learning curve; standardized testing; pedagogical experiment

Abstract

Standardized examinations — the SAT, the GRE, and their analogues — test something harder to measure than content recall: the capacity to reason quantitatively under pressure, to interpret unfamiliar data, to hold several logical constraints in mind simultaneously. Preparing students for this kind of assessment demands more than a syllabus of practice problems. It requires a coherent theory of how mathematical knowledge actually develops.

This study proposes and analyzes a mathematical model describing the growth of mathematical competence over time. The model treats knowledge acquisition as a nonlinear process that asymptotically approaches a theoretical ceiling — a pattern consistent with decades of empirical work on skill learning. To test its applicability, we conducted a ten-week pedagogical experiment with sixty undergraduate students divided into control and experimental groups. The experimental group followed a structured preparation program combining diagnostic assessment, guided problem-solving, and continuous instructor feedback.

The results were clear-cut. Students in the experimental group outperformed their peers on every assessment — final scores of 74.2 versus 63.5 — with the gap widening as the course progressed. Model parameters, fitted from empirical data, revealed a substantially higher learning rate in the structured group (α = 0.106) compared with the conventional format (α = 0.082). These findings suggest that mathematical modeling is not merely a descriptive convenience: it can serve as a practical instrument for designing and evaluating instructional programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2

2.Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

3.Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004

4.Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821

5.Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1885)

6.Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

7.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.

8.Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

9.Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

10.Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175

11.Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.

12.Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). Macmillan.

13.Slavin, R. E. (1990). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 300–302. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060002300

14.Wright, T. P. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 3(4), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.155

Downloads

Published

2026-03-11

How to Cite

MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF KNOWLEDGE ACCUMULATION IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING DURING STANDARDIZED TEST PREPARATION. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(03), 517-524. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2099

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.