ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TERMS “CONCEPT” AND “NOTION” IN COGNITIVE ONOMASIOLOGY AND LINGUOCULTURAL STUDIES

Authors

  • Sayfullaeva Zumradkhon Nuritdinovna, V. A. Anatolevn, T. P Troshkina Master’s Student Bukhara State University, Bukhara, Uzbekistan, Scientific Supervisor, (PhD) Doctor of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Bukhara State University, Bukhara, Uzbekistan, Scientific Consultant, (PhD) Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

concept, notion, nomination, cognitive onomasiology, linguocultural studies, representation, cognitive linguistics.

Abstract

The article examines the correlation between the terms concept and notion within the frameworks of cognitive onomasiology and linguocultural studies. Although these terms are frequently used interchangeably, their theoretical status varies significantly depending on disciplinary perspective. The study analyzes major interpretative approaches in Russian cognitive linguistics, linguocultural research, and philosophy of language, highlighting both convergences and divergences. Particular attention is paid to the role of conceptual structures in the process of nomination and to the distinction between logical abstraction and culturally marked mental representation. The findings demonstrate that while the notion traditionally refers to a logically structured cognitive abstraction, the concept functions as a broader category encompassing cognitive, cultural, evaluative, and symbolic dimensions. The article argues that integrating cognitive and linguocultural approaches enables a more comprehensive understanding of conceptual structures underlying linguistic nomination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Kubryakova, E. S. (2004). Language and Knowledge. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, p. 317.

2.Askoldov, S. A. (1997). Concept and Word. In Russian Philology Anthology, pp. 267–280.

3.Belyaevskaya, E. G. (1991). Semantic Structure of the Word, p. 62.

4.Babushkin (1996); Likhachev (1997); Boldyrev (2002); Pavilionis (1976).

5.Boldyrev, N. N. (2002). Structure and Formation Principles of Evaluative Categories.

6.Maslova, V. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 27–28.

7.Stepanov, Yu. S. (1997). Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture.

8.Kubryakova et al. (1997). Brief Dictionary of Cognitive Terms.

9.Kubryakova (2004), p. 318.

10.Demyankov, V. Z. (1997). Philosophical Interpretation of Conceptual Structures.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

How to Cite

ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TERMS “CONCEPT” AND “NOTION” IN COGNITIVE ONOMASIOLOGY AND LINGUOCULTURAL STUDIES. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(02), 1847-1850. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

21-30 of 1479

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.