FEATURES OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSES (CREEP AND EROSION) IN MOUNTAIN AREAS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • J.A.Ro‘ziyev Navoi State University, Navoi, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

creep; slow landslides; solifluction; soil erosion; gully erosion; Western Tien Shan; Pamir–Alay; Uzbekistan

Abstract

Mountain environments in Uzbekistan are characterized by high relief energy, active neotectonics, and sharp hydro‑climatic gradients, which together create favorable conditions for slope deformation and accelerated denudation. This article synthesizes the spatial patterns and controlling natural factors of two key geomorphological processes—creep (including slow landslides and periglacial solifluction) and erosion (sheet, rill, gully, and channel erosion)—using evidence from published case studies and recent remote-sensing applications in the Western Tien Shan and Pamir–Alay sectors. A conceptual framework is proposed in which (I) lithology and weathering state set the threshold strength of hillslopes, (II) topography and structural discontinuities regulate stress and drainage pathways, and (III) hydro‑meteorological forcing (rainfall intensity, snowmelt timing, and groundwater response) triggers seasonal acceleration and episodic failures. The review highlights that most hazardous slope events cluster in foothill–mid‑mountain belts where loess and colluvial covers overlie weaker bedrock and where anthropogenic disturbances (road cuts, irrigation seepage, reservoir water-level fluctuations) amplify natural susceptibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Fazilova, D., et al. (2025). A multi-criteria GIS model for geohazard assessment in the Charvak reservoir area, Uzbekistan. Journal of King Saud University – Science.

2.Rosi, A., et al. (2023). Comprehensive landslide susceptibility map of Central Asia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 23, 2229–2256.

3.Juliev, M., Pulatov, A., & Huebl, J. (2017). Landslide hazard and vulnerability assessment for urban territories of Uzbekistan: Tashkent city case study. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(10).

4.Saidova, M., et al. (2023). Earth Observation-based landslide inventory for Bostanlik district, Uzbekistan using object-based image analysis and random forest.

5.Gorbunov, A. P., & Seversky, E. V. (1999). Solifluction in the mountains of Central Asia: distribution, morphology, processes. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 10(1), 81–89. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(199901/03)10:1<81::AID-PPP307>3.0.CO;2-3

6.Kholmatov, B. M. et al. (2020). Rainfall-runoff erosivity in the Chirchik–Akhangaran basin (Uzbekistan): implications for soil erosion. Sustainability, 12(7), 2679.

7.FAOLEX (1994). Decree No. 194 of the Cabinet of Ministers setting up State Monitoring Service of Dangerous Geological Processes (Uzbekistan).

8.European Space Agency (2013). Monitoring of landslide hazard in selected areas of Uzbekistan (poster).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-13

How to Cite

FEATURES OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSES (CREEP AND EROSION) IN MOUNTAIN AREAS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEKISTAN. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(02), 999-1004. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 1803

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.