EMOJI AS ILLOCUTIONARY CUES IN COMPUTER‑MEDIATED COMMUNICATION: A COMPARATIVE PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK SPEECH ACTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines how emoji function as illocutionary cues in English and Uzbek digital discourse. Drawing on speech act theory and politeness pragmatics, we describe the ways emoji modulate the illocutionary force of requests, directives, evaluations, irony and humor. The analysis shows that English CMC frequently employs emoji for overt stance marking and irony signaling, whereas Uzbek CMC tends to use emoji more systematically for mitigation, face‑saving, and maintaining respectful social distance, especially in asymmetrical relations.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.1962
2.Brown, P., & Levinson, S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1987
3. Crystal, D. Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge.2011
4. Danesi, M. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.2017
5. Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 2010. 249–268.
6. Evans, V. The Emoji Code: How Smiley Faces, Love Hearts and Thumbs Up are Changing the Way We Communicate. London: Michael O’Mara.2017
7.Herring, S. C. Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. Barab et al. (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.2010
9. Kramsch, C. Language and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.1998
10. Pavalanathan, U., & Eisenstein, J. More emojis, less emoticons: The competition for paralinguistic function in microblog writing. First Monday, 21(11).
11. Searle, J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.1969
12. Wierzbicka, A. Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.1997