Psychological and Clinical Preparation of Patients for Breast Endoprosthesis Surgery

Authors

  • Rashidov Azizbek Fazliddin ugli 1st year master's student of the Department of Surgery, Endoscopy and Anesthesiology-Reanimatology, Samarkand State Medical University
  • Mizamov Furqat Ochilovich Samarkand State Medical University, Department of Surgery, Endoscopy and Anesthesiology-Resuscitation of the Faculty of Medicine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

breast, endoprosthesis, psychological preparation, clinical preparation, surgery.

Abstract

This article examines the key aspects of patient preparation for breast endoprosthesis surgery, with a particular focus on psychological and clinical preparation. A comprehensive preoperative approach plays a crucial role in ensuring successful surgical outcomes, reducing the risk of complications, and improving the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation. The impact of psychological preparation on patients’ emotional well-being and surgical outcomes, as well as the main stages of clinical preparation, are analyzed.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Abbas OL, Karagöz H. Preoperative patient education and outcomes in aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(2):470–478.

2.American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Breast augmentation: clinical practice guidelines. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(4):1–12.

3.Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1590–1601.

4.Cunningham B. The mentor core study on silicone memorygel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):19S–29S.

5.de Brito MJ, Nahas FX, Barbosa MVJ, et al. Psychological profile of patients undergoing aesthetic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(6):801–809.

6.Fink C, Schuster T, Huber M, et al. Psychological and social effects of breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(3):630–636.

7.Fischer JP, Cleveland E, Nelson JA, et al. Risk factors for complications following breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):1159–1168.

8.Gilmartin J. Anxiety and stress in preoperative patients. Nurs Stand. 2004;18(47):35–40.

9.Hall-Findlay EJ. Breast implant complication review. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(4):453–465.

10.Harcourt D, Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35(4):477–487.

11.Hidalgo DA, Sinno S. Current trends and controversies in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(4):1142–1150.

12.Honigman RJ, Phillips KA, Castle DJ. A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(4):1229–1237.

13.Johnston M, Vögele C. Benefits of psychological preparation for surgery. Br Med J. 1993;307(6897):271–274.

14.Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Scott A, Klok J, Cano SJ. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(6):683–691.

15.McCarthy CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, et al. Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(4):1133–1141.

16.Montgomery GH, Schnur JB, Erblich J, Diefenbach MA, Bovbjerg DH. Presurgery psychological factors predict pain, nausea, and fatigue one week after breast cancer surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(6):1043–1052.

17.Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–353.

18.Rumsey N, Harcourt D. Body image and disfigurement: issues and interventions. Body Image. 2004;1(1):83–97.

19.Sarwer DB, Crerand CE. Body image and cosmetic medical treatments. Body Image. 2004;1(1):99–111.

20.Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Pertschuk MJ, Whitaker LA. The psychology of cosmetic surgery: a review and reconceptualization. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998;18(1):1–22.

21.Sood A, Xue EY, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, et al. Adherence to postoperative instructions and surgical outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78(6):634–640.

22.Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):8S–16S.

23.Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant–soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(5):1255–1272.

24.Thorne CH, Chung KC, Gosain AK, et al. Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.

25.World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for safe surgery. Geneva: WHO Press; 2009.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-16

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

How to Cite

Psychological and Clinical Preparation of Patients for Breast Endoprosthesis Surgery. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(01), 877-882. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1145

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.