METAFICTION, METATEXT, AND METANARRATION: A DISCURSIVE RE-EXAMINATION IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH LITERATURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
metafiction, metatext, metanarration, discourse analysis, contemporary English literature, narrative self-reflexivityAbstract
Metafiction has long been recognized as a defining feature of postmodern and contemporary English literature; however, its frequent conflation with related concepts such as metatext and metanarration has led to theoretical ambiguity and methodological inconsistency. This article offers a discursive re-examination of metafiction, metatext, and metanarration as distinct yet interrelated narrative phenomena. Drawing on discourse analysis and narratological theory, the study reconceptualizes these terms as discursive strategies rather than merely formal devices. Through close textual analysis of selected contemporary English novels, the article demonstrates how metafiction operates as an overarching discursive mode, while metatext and metanarration function as embedded textual mechanisms that mediate authorial presence, reader positioning, and narrative self-awareness. The findings contribute to a clearer terminological differentiation and propose a discourse-based framework for analyzing self-reflexive fiction in contemporary literary studies.
Downloads
References
1.Waugh, P. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. London: Methuen, 1984.
2.Genette, G. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980.
3.Hutcheon, L. A Poetics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1988.
4.Lodge, D. The Art of Fiction. London: Penguin, 1992.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India