A PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO THE DESCRIPTION OF MEDICAL DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
medical discourse, pragmalinguistics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, speech communication, institutional discourse, doctor–patient interaction, mitigating linguistic devices, medical ethics, deontology, discourse, cognitive features, communicative strategy, linguotherapeutic orientationAbstract
This article examines the essence of speech communication as a complex and dynamic system from the perspective of pragmatic linguistics. In particular, the pragmalinguistic, psycholinguistic, and sociolinguistic features of medical discourse are analyzed, and the institutional and personal aspects of “doctor–patient” communication are revealed. The study substantiates the main functions of medical discourse, including information delivery, cognitive impact, ensuring communicative interaction, and serving therapeutic purposes. Special attention is paid to the role of mitigating linguistic devices in medical discourse (such as euphemisms, periphrasis, politeness strategies, expressiveness, and others), their influence on the patient’s psychological state, and their close connection with medical ethics and deontology. The article also highlights the scientific and everyday (colloquial) types of medical discourse, its discursive features as an institutional form of communication, and the importance of communicative strategies and tactics in doctor–patient interaction. The results of the study demonstrate the necessity of investigating medical discourse within the framework of a cognitive-pragmatic approach.
Downloads
References
Madzhaeva, S. I. Medical Terminological Systems: Formation, Development, Functioning. Doctoral dissertation in Philology. Volgograd, 2013. 356 p.
2.Madzhaeva, S. I. Deviant medical discourse as an ineffective style of doctor–patient interaction. Astrakhan Medical Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2010, pp. 133–137.
3.Zhura, V. V. Narratological studies of oral medical discourse. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2013, No. 1, pp. 72–78.
4.Goncharenko, N. V. Suggestive characteristics of medical discourse. PhD dissertation in Philology. Volgograd, 2008. 205 p.
5.Kurilenko, V. B., Makarova, M. A., Loginova, L. D. Modern Scientific Research and Innovations, 2012, No. 1.
6.Oleshkov, M. Yu. Fundamentals of Functional Linguistics: Discursive Aspect. Textbook. Nizhny Tagil: Nizhny Tagil State Pedagogical Academy, 2006. 146 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India