A HYBRID MODELING APPROACH FOR ACCURATE AND RELIABLE ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN THE BOUNDARY OPERATING MODES OF OPTICAL FIBER COMMUNICATION LINES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Optical fiber, boundary mode, dispersion, attenuation, modeling, OTDR, mechanical stress, BER.Abstract
This at work optician fibrous communication lines border work in the regimes signal characteristics exactly and reliable assessment for the purpose of hybrid modeling approach offer done in research such as temperature, mechanical stress and radiation border factors effect analysis done. BER, weakening and such as dispersion main parameters laboratory and simulation methods through measured. MATLAB on the platform modeling and analysis done. As a result border under the conditions FATHER 'S degradation and forecast signal quality opportunity was created. Research results BER and visualization of attenuation and their border to the factors was sensitivity determination possible gave. From this outside this sometimes borderline work modes of optical fiber communication physical and optical parameters of optical transmission lines (OTAL) in learning methodology used and modeling methods statement will be done. Research object as highway and local optical lines selected and in them attenuation, dispersion, mechanical stress and temperature dynamic changes under the influence is evaluated. Modeling MATLAB and Opti System in their environment to do increased is based on them light spread, signal loss and phase mathematical models of distortions with the help of analysis done Experimental order OTDR, OSA and laser source based on organization the data is statistical and spectral methods through again processed. Article FATHER systems border in cases reliability assessment complex scientific for approach present will.
Downloads
References
1.Головин В. И. Волоконно-оптические линии связи. - М.: Техносфера, 2018.
2.Дроздов А. И. Методы измерения параметров ВОЛС. - М.: Энергоатомиздат, 2017.
3.Казакова Н. И. Измерения в оптических системах передачи. - СПб.: БХВ, 2019.
4.Agrawal G. P. Fiber-Optic Communication Systems. Wiley, 2021.
5.Agrawal, G. P., Fiber-Optic Communication Systems, 5th Edition, Wiley, 2010.
6.He, Y., et al., “Radiation-induced attenuation in silica fibers,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2019.
7.Hecht, J., Understanding Fiber Optics, 5th Edition, Pearson, 2015.
8.IEEE Std 2131-2020, Radiation Effects in Optical Fibers, IEEE, 2020.
9.ITU-T G.652, G.655, G.657 Optical fiber standards, 2020.
10.Keiser G. Optical Fiber Communications. McGraw-Hill, 2019.
11.Keiser, G., Optical Fiber Communications, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2021.
12.Kumar, N., et al., “Dispersion and Ночизиқ Effects in Fibers under Stress,” Applied Optics, 2021.
13.Li, X., et al., “BER Analysis for High-power Optical Transmission,” Optics Express, 2019.
14.MATLAB Documentation, Data Analysis and Visualization, MathWorks, 2023.
15.MATLAB Documentation, Data Import and Export, MathWorks, 2023.
16.OFS Fitel, OTDR and Fiber Characterization Manual, 2020.
17.Saleh, B. E. A., Teich, M. C., Fundamentals of Photonics, 3rd Edition, Wiley, 2019.
18.Senior J., Jamro M. Optical Fiber Communications: Principles and Practice. Pearson, 2020.
19.Senior, J. M., Jamro, M. Y., Optical Fiber Communications: Principles and Practice, 3rd Edition, Pearson, 2009.
20.Smith R., Novak D. Optical Networks and Transmission. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India