IMPROVING DATABASE DIFFERENCES IN NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Local Information Systems (LIS) are used in almost all areas of data management, creating a decision support system that is very important for decision-makers. From a theoretical and institutional point of view, LIS is a decision-making system based on the integration of spatial (locational) information. The consistency of the information processed in LIS, which is the only source for the correct analysis and effective management of information about the mahalla in mahalla committees, khokimiyats and their subordinate departments, is of great importance. The diversity of sources used in the data collection process, interruptions in information exchange and inconsistencies between systems create the need for restructuring in local governance systems. This study highlights improvement methods aimed at eliminating problems associated with database integration between different local government departments and develops a practical model that allows for automatic integration of all departments while ensuring the integrity of the Mahalla Information System.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Gruber, TR (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications . Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.
2.Fonseca, F., Egenhofer, M. (2002). Ontology-driven geographic information systems . In 8th ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems.
3.Brodeur, J., Vanderwalk, C. (2003). The role of semantic web in geospatial information integration . Journal of Web Semantics, 1(4), 325–345.
4.Couclelis, H. (2003). The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge . Transactions in GIS, 7(2), 165–175.
5.Beaumont, P. (1992). GIS and local government: Case studies in decision support . International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6(4), 357–371.
6.McGuinness, DL (2002). Ontologies for geographical information systems . Journal of Spatial Information Science, 3(1), 27–36.
7.Goodchild, MF (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteer geography . GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.
8.Grelot, F. (1994). Data integration challenges in GIS-based decision systems . International Journal of GIS Science, 8(3), 201–215.
9.Yomralıoğlu, T. (2005). Geographic Information Systems: Basic Concepts and Applications . John Wiley & Sons.
10.Fonseca, F. (2008). Information integration and ontologies in GIScience . International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(2), 133–144.