SOVEREIGN DEBT IN ISLAMIC ECONOMICS:SUKUK AS A SHARI'AH-COMPLIANT ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL BONDS —THEORY, GROWTH, AND FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Sovereign sukuk, Islamic public debt, riba prohibition, OIC fiscal policy, Shari'ah-compliant finance, Islamic Development BankAbstract
Contemporary Islamic states confront a fundamental tension between developmental financing requirements and the Shari'ah prohibition on riba (interest-based debt). This paper examines how sovereign sukuk—Shari'ah-compliant capital market instruments backed by tangible assets or usufruct rights—have emerged as the primary mechanism for resolving this tension. Using data from the International Islamic Financial Market (IIFM), the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB), and official fiscal statistics for seven OIC member states (2017–2022), we document the rapid growth of the sovereign sukuk market from USD 210.3 billion in annual issuance (2017) to USD 418.8 billion (2022). Our comparative analysis reveals that countries with sukuk-to-total-debt ratios exceeding 30% demonstrate lower borrowing costs and broader investor bases. However, we identify a critical governance risk: the growing use of synthetic sukuk structures that replicate conventional bond economics without genuine asset transfer. We conclude with recommendations for strengthening sukuk governance to ensure Shari'ah integrity while supporting Islamic states' fiscal sustainability.
References
1.AAOIFI (2015). Shari'ah Standard No. 17: Investment Sukuk. Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions, Bahrain.
2.BNM (2022). Financial Stability Review, First Half 2022. Bank Negara Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
3.Buchanan, J.M. (1958). Public Principles of Public Debt. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
4.Chapra, M.U. (2000). The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Islamic Foundation, Leicester.
5.Government of Indonesia, Ministry of Finance (2022). Surat Berharga Syariah Negara (SBSN) Annual Report 2022. Ministry of Finance, Jakarta.
6.ICD-IsDB (2022). Islamic Finance Development Report 2022. Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector, Jeddah.
7.IIFM (2022). IIFM Sukuk Report: A Comprehensive Study of the Global Sukuk Market, 11th Edition. International Islamic Financial Market, Bahrain.
8.IIFM (2023). IIFM Annual Sukuk Report 2023. International Islamic Financial Market, Bahrain.
9.IMF (2023). Fiscal Monitor: Helping People Bounce Back. International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.
10.IMF (2023). World Economic Outlook Database, April 2023. International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.
11.IRTI-IsDB (2020). Survey of Shari'ah Non-Compliant Events and Risks in Islamic Finance: Sukuk. Islamic Research and Training Institute, Islamic Development Bank Group, Jeddah.
12.IsDB (2022). Islamic Development Bank Annual Report 2021. Islamic Development Bank, Jeddah.
13.Khan, M.A. (1991). Role of Government in an Islamic Economy. Institute of Policy Studies, Lahore.
14.Pakistan, Government of (2023). Pakistan Economic Survey 2022–23. Ministry of Finance, Islamabad.
15.Saudi Arabia, NDMC (2022). Annual Borrowing Plan 2022. National Debt Management Center, Riyadh.
16.Securities Commission Malaysia (2022). Islamic Capital Market: Statistical Bulletin, December 2022. Securities Commission, Kuala Lumpur.
17.Usmani, M.T. (2008). Sukuk and their Contemporary Applications (trans. from Arabic). AAOIFI, Bahrain.
18.World Bank (2023). Public Sector Debt Statistics. World Bank, Washington D.C.
19.World Bank (2023). World Development Indicators 2023. World Bank Open Data, Washington D.C.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

