COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND IFRS: TRANSITION PATHWAYS FOR UZBEK ENTERPRISES

Authors

  • Omonov Rustam Sobriddin o’g’li Master’s student, National Research University "Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

IFRS adoption, Uzbekistan economy, National Accounting Standards, Financial transparency, Transition roadmap, Investment attractiveness, Asset valuation

Abstract

This research provides a complete comparative study between the National Accounting Standards (NAS) of Uzbekistan and the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), especially focusing on the strategic transition pathways for domestic enterprises. As Uzbekistan fosters its integration into the global financial system, the divergence between rule-based national accounting and principle-based international frameworks represent immense obstacles for transparency and foreign investment. Through a qualitative and comparative methodology, the study find out essential discrepancies in asset valuation, income recognition, and financial instrument disclosure. The findings show that while the legislative framework in Uzbekistan has been updated to support IFRS, practical implementation is hindered by a substantial "technological gap" in automated accounting systems and a a lack of internationally certified professionals. The paper proposes a structured transition roadmap that focuses on the synchronization of digital infrastructure and the enhancement of professional competencies through global certification programs like ACCA. Finally, this research concludes that a successful transition to IFRS is not merely a technical adjustment but a vital prerequisite for increasing the investment attractiveness of Uzbek enterprises and ensuring long-term economic stability in the region.

References

1.Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Uzbekistan, National Accounting Standards Collection, Tashkent, 2022.

2.Sh. Kadyrov, International Accounting Standards, Tashkent: Economics-Finance, 2020.

3.Kazachenko, L. D. (2006). Investitsionnaya politika. Chita. (in Russian).

4.Ankarath, N., Mehta, K. J., Ghosh, T. P., & Alkafaji, Y. A. (2010). Understanding IFRS fundamentals: international financial reporting standards. John Wiley & Sons.

5.Obinson, T. R. (2020). International financial statement analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

6.IFRS Foundation, IFRS 16 –Lease Accounting Standard, Translation: Accounting and Audit Center under the Ministry of Finance, Tashkent, 2019

7.M. Sattorova, Accounting for Lease and Lease, Bukhara: BSU Publishing House, 2022

8.Adamenko A.A. Scientific development of foreign accounting methodology/ A.A.Adamenko A.S. Tkachenko // Economy. Right. Print. Bulletin of the CSEI. 2016. –No. 3. –Pp.297-303.

9.Alisenov A. S. International Financial Reporting Standards: textbook and workshop for undergraduate and specialist / A. S. Alisenov. 2nd ed., reprint. and additional. Moscow.Yurayt Publishing House, 2019. - 404 p

10.Khalilov, Sh., & Karimov, A. (2020). Improvement of National Accounting Standards Based on IAS 7. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 6(11), 294-299. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414- 2948/60/36

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND IFRS: TRANSITION PATHWAYS FOR UZBEK ENTERPRISES. (2026). International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics, 5(4), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 708

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.