OPTIMIZATION OF CORS STATION PLACEMENT USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS: AN AHP-BASED GIS APPROACH FOR UZBEKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
CORS, GNSS, AHP, GIS, site selection, multi-criteria decision analysis, Uzbekistan.Abstract
The establishment of a dense and optimally distributed Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) network is a fundamental requirement for achieving high-precision GNSS positioning, geodetic monitoring, and spatial data infrastructure development. In countries with complex topography, seismic activity, and uneven population distribution, the placement of CORS stations must be based on a comprehensive, multi-criteria evaluation rather than uniform spacing alone. This study presents an integrated Geographic Information System (GIS) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework for optimizing the spatial distribution of CORS stations across the territory of Uzbekistan. Six key thematic criteria-agricultural land use, population density, existing CORS coverage, seismic hazard, digital elevation model (DEM), and terrain slope-were standardized, reclassified, weighted, and integrated into a composite suitability index. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach effectively identifies priority zones for new CORS station deployment, particularly in densely populated, agriculturally intensive, and seismically active regions with limited current coverage. The proposed methodology provides a replicable and scalable decision-support tool for national geodetic authorities and contributes to the advancement of evidence-based geodetic network planning.
References
1. Cetin, M., Omer, Y., & Sedat, B. (2011). The Turkish real time kinematic GPS network (TUSAGA-Aktif) infrastructure. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(19), 3986–3999. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.923
2. Dobelis, D., & Zvirgzds, J. (2016). Network RTK performance analysis: A case study in Latvia. Geodesy and cartography, 42(3), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.3846/20296991.2016.1226383
3. Bruyninx, C., Becker, M., & Stangl, G. (2001). Regional densification of the IGS in europe using the EUREF permanent GPS network (EPN). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy, 26(6–8), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00096-5
4. Bartonek, D., Bures, J., & Svabensky, O. (2017). Optimized GNSS RTK measurement planning for effective point occupation via heuristic analysis. ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 34(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-11-2015-0352
5. Central Aero-geodetic Enterprise, & Bekbaev, G. K. (2014). About reconstruction and development of the state geodetic network of Republic Uzbekistan. Geodesy and Cartography, 888(6), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.22389/0016-7126-2014-888-6-8-9
6. AlAli, A. M., Salih, A., & Hassaballa, A. (2023, May 20). Geospatial-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Weighted Product Model (WPM) Techniques for Mapping and Assessing Flood Susceptibility in the Wadi Hanifah Drainage Basin, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. WATER. ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15101943
7. Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508
8. Fazilova, F., Norkulov, B., & Tursunov, B. (2021). Modernization of the national geodetic network in Uzbekistan using GNSS technologies. Geoinformatics Journal, 15(4), 67–74.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

