COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADITIONAL AND MODERN METHODS IN ANATOMY TEACHING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Anatomy education; traditional teaching methods; modern teaching technologies; cadaver-based learning; digital anatomy; medical education.Abstract
Anatomy is a fundamental discipline in medical education, forming the basis for understanding clinical sciences and medical practice. Traditionally, anatomy has been taught using lectures, textbooks, and cadaver-based dissection. However, recent advances in educational technology have introduced modern teaching methods such as digital atlases, virtual reality, three-dimensional (3D) models, and interactive learning platforms. This article aims to compare the effectiveness of traditional and modern methods in anatomy teaching, focusing on learning outcomes, student engagement, and knowledge retention. The analysis demonstrates that while traditional methods remain essential for developing deep anatomical understanding, modern approaches enhance visualization, accessibility, and student motivation. An integrated teaching strategy that combines both approaches appears to be the most effective model for contemporary anatomy education.References
1.Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in medical schools. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2014;7(3):229–233.
2.McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present, and future. Medical Education. 2006;40(3):243–253.
3.Azer SA, Azer S. 3D anatomy models and virtual reality in anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2016;9(3):206–212.
4.Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2007;89(2):104–107.
5.Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2016;9(6):483–500.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

