EVALUATING POLICY INCENTIVES FOR ATTRACTING FDI INTO THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: AN EXTENDED COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF SELECTED CIS ECONOMIES

Authors

  • Boynazarov Behzod Sheraliyevich Master’s student of University of Economy and Diplomacy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Investment Incentives, Industrial Policy, Special Economic Zones (SEZs), Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Performance-Based Incentives, Investment Promotion Agencies, Manufacturing FDI, Fiscal Policy, Investment Climate, Technology Transfer, Global Value Chains (GVCs), One-Stop-Shop Services, After-Care Services, FDI Policy Evaluation.

Abstract

This comprehensive policy analysis investigates the effectiveness of foreign direct investment (FDI) incentive regimes across five post-Soviet economies—Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Azerbaijan—between 2020 and 2024. The article adopts a hybrid theoretical lens that includes Dunning’s OLI framework, strategic industrial policy theory, and cost–benefit logic to examine how fiscal, financial, regulatory, and spatial instruments shape investor behavior in the manufacturing sector. Using both quantitative data (from UNCTADstat and national sources) and qualitative evaluations (e.g., investor services efficiency, policy credibility), the authors trace the evolution of each country’s incentive package and link specific policy shifts to measurable FDI outcomes such as sectoral diversification and SME integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.ADB (2024) Industrial Zone Performance in Uzbekistan: A Firm-Level Analysis. Asian Development Bank. [Online] Available at: https://www.adb.org/ [Accessed 15 May 2025].

2.Deloitte (2024) International Tax Highlights: Azerbaijan 2024. Deloitte. [Online] Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/ [Accessed 15 May 2025].

3. World Bank (2024) Azerbaijan Investment Retention and Exit Trends. World Bank Group. [Online] Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/ [Accessed 17 May 2025].

4.EBRD (2024) Belarus: Country Assessment and Financial Risk Outlook. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. [Online] Available at: https://www.ebrd.com/ [Accessed 20 May 2025].

5.Government of Kazakhstan (2024) Concept of Investment Policy 2024–2029. Approved 18 October 2024. UNCTAD Investment Policy Hub. [Online] Available at: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/ [Accessed 5 May 2025].

6.Great Stone Industrial Park Administration (2024) Annual Report 2024. [Online] Available at: https://industrialpark.by/ [Accessed 9 May 2025].

7.Morgan Lewis (2024) Concept of Investment Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan Approved until 2029. Policy Brief, December 2024. [Online] Available at: https://www.morganlewis.com/ [Accessed 2 May 2025].

8.U.S. Department of State (2024) 2024 Investment Climate Statements: Uzbekistan; Kazakhstan. [Online] Available at: https://www.state.gov/reports/ [Accessed 22 May 2025].

Downloads

Published

2025-06-08

How to Cite

EVALUATING POLICY INCENTIVES FOR ATTRACTING FDI INTO THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR: AN EXTENDED COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF SELECTED CIS ECONOMIES. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(5), 88-92. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 2575

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.