LEXICAL-SEMANTIC AND LINGUISTIC-CULTURAL FEATURES OF EVERYDAY RUSSIAN VOCABULARY AND SOME DIFFERENCES FROM THE UZBEK LANGUAGE.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Abstract
Abstract: This article examines the linguacognitive and semantic properties of everyday Russian vocabulary. Everyday vocabulary, related to human life, home, and household items, is one of the oldest and most dynamic layers of language. The article analyzes the reflection of this lexical layer in linguistic consciousness, its conceptualization, and its division into semantic domains using materials from the Russian and Uzbek languages as examples. The article also examines the semantic layers of everyday vocabulary, its conceptual structure, its connection with national-cultural codes, and its functional potential in speech. This study, based on a linguacultural approach, demonstrates how the worldview and cultural stereotypes of the Russian people are reflected in linguistic units. In addition, the article presents some differences in the lexical-semantic and linguocultural properties of everyday words in the Russian and Uzbek languages.
Downloads
References
1.Кубрякова Е.С. Когнитивная лингвистика. — Москва: Наука, 2004. — 312 с.
2.Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология. — Москва: Академия, 2001. — 208 с.
3.Попова З.Д., Стернин И.А. Когнитивная лингвистика. — Воронеж: Истоки, 2007. — 256 с.
4.Степанов Ю.С. Константы: Словарь русской культуры. — Москва: Академический проект, 1997. — 824 с.
5.Шмелев Д. Н. Проблемы семантического анализа лексики. — М.: Наука, 1973. — 280 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India