CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF MYTHOLOGICAL ALLUSIVE ANTHROPONYMS IN THE ENGLISH LITERARY TEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
mythological allusion, anthroponym, conceptual analysis, literary discourse, cognitive linguistics, English literature, mythological symbolism, intertextuality, cultural cognition, character representation, conceptual metaphor, literary onomastics.Abstract
This article investigates the conceptual nature and literary functions of mythological allusive anthroponyms in English literary texts. Mythological allusive anthroponyms are personal names derived from mythological characters, figures, and narratives that evoke culturally embedded meanings beyond their direct referential function. The study explores how such anthroponyms contribute to the construction of character identity, thematic development, and symbolic representation in literary discourse. Employing conceptual and cognitive-linguistic approaches, the research examines the mechanisms through which mythological names activate shared cultural knowledge and conceptual frameworks within readers’ minds. Particular attention is given to the semantic transformation of mythological references when they are integrated into literary contexts, where they acquire new interpretative dimensions while preserving traces of their original mythological meanings. The analysis demonstrates that mythological allusive anthroponyms function as powerful conceptual markers that facilitate the transmission of complex ideas related to heroism, wisdom, beauty, betrayal, power, and fate. Furthermore, these names enhance textual cohesion and enrich the aesthetic and pragmatic impact of literary works. The findings reveal that the conceptual potential of mythological anthroponyms enables authors to establish intertextual connections between ancient mythological traditions and contemporary literary narratives. As a result, mythological allusive anthroponyms serve not only as naming devices but also as significant cognitive and cultural instruments that shape readers’ interpretation of literary texts and contribute to the preservation and transformation of mythological knowledge across generations.
Downloads
References
1.Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. G. (2015). A glossary of literary terms (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
2.Barry, P. (2020). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory (4th ed.). Manchester University Press.
3.Bertens, H. (2014). Literary theory: The basics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
4.Evans, V. (2019). Cognitive linguistics: A complete guide (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
5.Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. Basic Books.
6.Genette, G. (1997). Palimpsests: Literature in the second degree. University of Nebraska Press.
7.Hamilton, E. (2017). Mythology: Timeless tales of gods and heroes. Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers.
8.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
9.Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
10.Lotman, Y. M. (2009). Culture and explosion. Walter de Gruyter.
11.Nikolajeva, M. (2014). Reading for learning: Cognitive approaches to children's literature. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
12.Nünning, A. (Ed.). (2010). Metzler lexikon literatur- und kulturtheorie. J. B. Metzler.
13.Oxford University Press. (2024). Oxford reference: Classical mythology. Oxford University Press.
14.Tyson, L. (2023). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide (4th ed.). Routledge.
15.Vico, G. (2002). The new science (D. Marsh, Trans.). Penguin Classics.
16.Wales, K. (2014). A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India