FORMULATING REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL CLOTHING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND HIERARCHICAL FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
special clothing requirements; protective garment design; multi-criteria framework; PPE standards; textile engineering; smart textiles; hazard assessment; ergonomic comfort.Abstract
The formulation of requirements for special clothing systems is a multidimensional engineering challenge that bridges materials science, ergonomics, human factors, and regulatory compliance. Despite its critical importance for occupational safety across military, emergency response, medical, and industrial sectors, no unified framework for systematically deriving and validating special clothing requirements currently exists in the literature. This systematic review analyzes 312 peer-reviewed studies indexed in Scopus and Web of Science (2010–2024) to synthesize a hierarchical requirement formulation framework encompassing seven primary domains: mechanical protection, thermal resistance, chemical barrier function, ergonomic comfort, smart/electronic integration, biological protection, and sustainability. Meta-analysis of quantitative performance data reveals significant heterogeneity (I² = 28–68%) across requirement domains, underscoring the context-specificity of requirement formulation. A radar-based multi-criteria weighting model is proposed for domain-specific application. Critical gaps in current international standards coverage are quantified, with smart textile durability (38% coverage) and multi-threat combined testing (42% coverage) identified as most urgent priorities. The proposed framework provides a structured, evidence-based tool for designers, safety engineers, and standards bodies engaged in the development and certification of special clothing systems.
Downloads
References
[1] Bhuiyan, M. A. R., et al. (2022). Personal protective equipment (PPE): An overview of demand, supply, and global challenges. Journal of Safety Research, 80, 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.006
[2] Cho, G., & Kim, S. (2021). Functional and smart textiles for personal protective clothing. Textile Research Journal, 91(5–6), 651–672.
[3] Grand View Research. (2024). Protective Clothing Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report 2024–2030. GVR-2-68038-781-6.
[4] Langley, R. L., & Mort, S. A. (2012). Human exposures to pesticides in the United States. Journal of Agromedicine, 17(3), 300–315.
[5] Song, G. (Ed.). (2011). Improving comfort in clothing. Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090645
[6] Hald, T., et al. (2020). Non-compliance with PPE in healthcare: Systematic review. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 41(9), 1007–1016.
[7] McLellan, T. M., & Selkirk, G. A. (2006). The management of heat stress in operations. Military Medicine, 171(5), 415–419.
[8] Militky, J., Venkataraman, M., & Periyasamy, A. P. (2021). Fibrous structures and their properties. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52169-2
[9] Yetisen, A. K., et al. (2016). Nanotechnology in textiles. ACS Nano, 10(3), 3042–3068.
[10] Horrocks, A. R. (2011). Flame retardant challenges for textiles: New chemistry versus innovatory solutions. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 96(3), 377–392.
[11] Cao, H., & Branson, D. H. (2007). Material selection strategies for a cooling vest. Journal of ASTM International, 4(2), 1–10.
[12] Nihlén, A., & Rexroth, L. (2019). Review of EU/EN standards for chemical protective clothing. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 63(4), 388–401.
[13] ISO 13688:2013. Protective clothing – General requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
[14] IEEE Std 29148-2018. Systems and Software Engineering – Life Cycle Processes – Requirements Engineering. IEEE.
[15] EN ISO 11612:2015. Protective clothing – Clothing to protect against heat and flame. European Committee for Standardization.
[16] NIJ Standard-0101.06. (2008). Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor. U.S. Department of Justice.
[17] EN 374-1:2016. Protective gloves against chemicals and micro-organisms. CEN.
[18] ISO 11092:2014. Textiles – Physiological effects – Measurement of thermal and water-vapour resistance. ISO.
[19] NFPA 2112:2018. Standard on Flame-Resistant Clothing for Protection of Industrial Personnel. NFPA.
[20] EN 14126:2003+AC:2004. Protective clothing – Performance requirements for chemical protective clothing. CEN.
[21] Mukhopadhyay, A., & Midha, V. K. (2008). Waterproof breathable fabrics Part I: Fundamental principles. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 37(3), 225–262.
[22] Bourbigot, S., & Flambard, X. (2002). Heat resistance and flammability of high performance fibres. Fire and Materials, 26(4–5), 155–168.
[23] Castano, L. M., & Flatau, A. B. (2014). Smart fabric sensors and e-textile technologies. Smart Materials and Structures, 23(5), 053001.
[24] Stoppa, M., & Chiolerio, A. (2014). Wearable electronics and smart textiles: A critical review. Sensors, 14(7), 11957–11992.
[25] Mondal, S. (2008). Phase change materials for smart textiles—An overview. Applied Thermal Engineering, 28(11–12), 1536–1550.
[26] Gao, C., et al. (2010). Cooling vests with PCMs and functional arm strength. Ergonomics, 53(10), 1225–1234.
[27] DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188.
[28] Forsberg, K., & Mooz, H. (1991). The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle. INCOSE Proceedings, 1, 57–65.
[29] Edmonds, C. S., et al. (2021). Why workers don't wear PPE: A systematic review. Safety Science, 133, 105010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India