VALUE-BASED ASSESSMENT AS AN ANALYTICAL LINGUISTIC CATEGORY: STRUCTURAL AND SEMANTIC FUNCTIONS IN THE LINGUISTIC WORLDVIEW

Authors

  • Salokhiddinov Manuchekhr PhD, Senior lecturer of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20478125

Keywords:

value-based assessment, linguistic category, linguistic picture of the world, evaluative components, semantics, pragmatics, cognitive linguistics, conceptualization, socio-cultural traits, discourse.

Abstract

The present study offers a theoretical and scientific examination of axiological evaluation, framing it as a crucial category within linguistic analysis. It sheds light on the mechanisms underlying the formation of positive and negative evaluative meanings through various linguistic units, detailing their semantic, pragmatic, and cognitive characteristics. Additionally, the paper explores the contribution of value-based assessments to the construction of the linguistic worldview, highlighting their deep-rooted connections to national-cultural factors and their influence on the conceptual framework of language users. By analyzing concrete examples, the research investigates the manifestation of evaluative components across multiple linguistic tiers—specifically lexical, phraseological, and syntactic—and identifies their communicative and pragmatic roles. Ultimately, the findings substantiate the integral position of the axiological category within the language system and its vital function in shaping conceptual structures within the linguistic picture of the world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lebedeva, N. Yu. (2022). Intercultural communication: Language and culture. Moscow: LIBROKOM Book House, 248 p.

2. Abdrakhmanova, G. F. (2020). Language and values: An axiological aspect. Moscow: LKI, 248 p.

3. Bocharnikova, T. I. (2021). Concepts in the mirror of national culture. Moscow: Infra-M, 156 p.

4. Zimnyaya, I. A. (2018). Linguistic conceptualization of the world. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture, 232 p.

5. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 248 p.

6. Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 248 p.

7. Apresyan, Yu. D. (1974). Lexical semantics. Moscow: Nauka, 248 p.

8. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 248 p.

9. Permyakov, G. L. (1988). Fundamentals of structural paremiology. Moscow: Nauka, 248 p.

10. Kartashova, V. A. (2022). Axiological parameters of translation. Moscow: Logos, 168 p.

11. Reznik, S. D. (2021). Discourse and values in the linguocultural space. Moscow: Logos, 200 p.

12. Sorokina, E. V. (2017). Axiology and language: Correlation and interaction. Kazan: Kazan University Press, 182 p.

13. Gudym, I. N. (2018). Cognitive-discursive analysis of proverbs. St. Petersburg: Lema, 210 p.

14. Leontiev, A. A. (1975). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat, 304 p.

15. Yartseva, K. V. (2012). The concept of the "worldview": The adaptive function of the

worldview. Moscow: Logos, 180 p.

16. von Humboldt, W. (1836). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts [On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species]. Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 500 p.

17. Selemeneva, O. A. (2012). Formation of the linguistic worldview concept in linguocognitology. Moscow: Infra-M, 190 p.

18. Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 190 p.

19. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press, 190 p.

20. Maslova, V. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Moscow: Infra-M, 190 p.

21. Volf, E. M. (1985). Functional semantics of evaluation. Moscow: Nauka, 230 p.

22. Maslova, V. A. (2001). Linguoculturology. Moscow: Academia, 240 p.

23. Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Language and the human world. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture, 896 p.

24. Karaulov, Yu. N. (1987). The Russian language and the linguistic persona. Moscow: Nauka, 264 p.

25. Savchenko, E. Yu. (2014). Linguistic representation of axiological parameters in discourse.

Kazan: Kazan University Press, 190 p.

26. Shevchenko, N. A. (2019). Evaluative concepts in the linguistic worldview. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University (UrFU) Press, 186 p.

27. Karasik, V. I. (2004). The language circle: Personality, concepts, discourse. Moscow: Gnosis, 392 p.

28. Plotnikov, A. V. (2011). Value semantics of language: Theory and practice. Saratov: Saratov State University (SSU) Publishing House, 220 p.

29. Zorina, E. V. (2013). Evaluation in discourse: Cognitive and pragmatic aspects. Moscow: Logos, 220 p.

30. Zverev, Yu. I. (2018). Axiology and ethnic consciousness. St. Petersburg: Lan, 224 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

VALUE-BASED ASSESSMENT AS AN ANALYTICAL LINGUISTIC CATEGORY: STRUCTURAL AND SEMANTIC FUNCTIONS IN THE LINGUISTIC WORLDVIEW. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(5), 2027-2035. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20478125

Similar Articles

1-10 of 3316

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.