NEUROLINGUISTIC CHALLENGES IN LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Eshmurodova Muhayyo Termez State University 70230101 – Linguistics (English) 1st year master's student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20260177

Keywords:

second language acquisition; neurolinguistics; neuroplasticity; cognitive control; working memory; age of acquisition; sleep-dependent consolidation; dyslexia; developmental language disorder; fMRI; ERP.

Abstract

 Foreign-language learning is constrained not only by exposure and motivation but also by neurobiological limits and tradeoffs in how the brain represents speech, grammar, and meaning. Methods involved a structured narrative review prioritizing meta-analyses, longitudinal neuroimaging/ERP studies, and large-sample behavioral work. Results converge on several quantifiable patterns: grammar-learning ability shows a marked age-related decline after late adolescence in large-sample modeling (estimated turning point ≈ 17.4 years in one widely cited dataset). Age of acquisition effects appear robust even when bilingualism is controlled, with a factorial design study (n=80) reporting major age effects and minimal bilingualism effects on ultimate attainment. Neuroplastic changes occur in adults but often recruit control-related circuitry: a one-year longitudinal structural MRI study of Chinese university students showed gray matter volume reductions in left anterior cingulate cortex and right inferior frontal gyrus, with correlation between age of acquisition and volumetric change (r=0.595). Working memory shows a reliable, small-to-moderate relationship with L2 outcomes across large meta-analyses (ρ≈.255; and r≈.300 for L2 reading). Sleep supports consolidation of newly learned foreign words, including implicit measures; immersive learning environments can modulate this consolidation. The discussion integrates these findings into a practical neurocognitive framework: L2 learning difficulty spikes when phonological category formation, proceduralized grammar, and interference control compete for limited neural and cognitive resources, especially in learners with weaker working memory or reading-language vulnerabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Mirzayev, I.K. “Neyropsixolingvistika sinergetikasiga kirish: lingvistika, neyrolingvistika va psixolingvistikaning integratsiyasi.” “Neyropsixolingvistika va salomatlik” xalqaro elektron jurnal, 2026, 1(1), 23–29.

2.Tolibboyeva, S.Sh.Q.; Sotiboldiyeva, M.Q.Q. “Chet tillarini o‘qitish va o‘rganishda neyrolingvistik metodlar.” Theoretical Aspects in the Formation of Pedagogical Sciences, 2023, 2(5), 70–73.

3.Rayhonova, G.O. “Neyrolingvistika. Neyrolingvistik tadqiqotlarning o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari.” Samarali ta’lim va barqaror innovatsiyalar jurnali, 2024, 2(1), 270–273

4.Hartshorne, J.K.; Tenenbaum, J.B.; Pinker, S. “A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers.” Cognition, 2018, 177, 263–277.

5.Linck, J.A.; Osthus, P.; Koeth, J.T.; Bunting, M.F. “Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2014, 21, 861–883.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-17

How to Cite

NEUROLINGUISTIC CHALLENGES IN LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(5), 1108-1114. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20260177

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2498

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.